James Stroud wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> A friend of mine dropped off a copy of Sams Teach Yourself Python in
>> 24 Hours published in 2000. I skimmed the first couple of chapters
>> looking for the interpreter version and the book was based on version
>> Python version 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> A friend of mine dropped off a copy of Sams Teach Yourself Python in
> 24 Hours published in 2000. I skimmed the first couple of chapters
> looking for the interpreter version and the book was based on version
> Python version 1.5.
>
> Is this book still
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> A friend of mine dropped off a copy of Sams Teach Yourself Python in
> 24 Hours published in 2000. I skimmed the first couple of chapters
> looking for the interpreter version and the book was based on version
> Python version 1.5.
>
> Is this book still r
> http://docs.python.org/tut/http://www.diveintopython.org/
I'm dense so the online python docs make great sources for reference
points and they help clarify ambiguity but its too dry (without enough
sample code) to help me fully understand the concepts.
I think Dive Into Python would probably
> A friend of mine dropped off a copy of Sams Teach Yourself Python in
> 24 Hours published in 2000. I skimmed the first couple of chapters
> looking for the interpreter version and the book was based on version
> Python version 1.5.
>
> Is this book still relevant? Should I toss it and look for
On Aug 22, 3:27 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> A friend of mine dropped off a copy of Sams Teach Yourself Python in
> 24 Hours published in 2000. I skimmed the first couple of chapters
> looking for the interpreter version and the book was based on version
> Py
