John Nagle writes:
> QNX's message passing looks more like a subroutine call than an
> I/O operation,
How do they enforce process isolation, or do they decide they don't need to?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:14:33 -0800, John Nagle wrote:
> I won't even get into the appalling mess around the Global Interpreter
> Lock.
You know full well that IronPython and Jython don't have a GIL. If the
GIL was as harmful as you repeatedly tell us, why haven't you, and
everyone else, migrate
On 1/31/2012 8:04 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
({muse: who do we have to kill
to persuade OS designers to incorporate something like the Amiga ARexx
"rexxport" system}).
QNX, which is a real-time microkernel which looks like POSIX to
applications. actually got interprocess communication rig
Le 31/01/2012 17:04, Dennis Lee Bieber a écrit :
Of course, if that thread is stuck waiting for a call to os.system()
to complete, then it can not do anything...
os.system() is a rather limited, restrictive, call -- best used for
quick one-of operations. If running Python 2.
