Re: JavaScript vs Python

2010-11-09 Thread Stef Mientki
On 09-11-2010 10:25, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > In message , Chris > Rebert wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro >> wrote: >> >>> Because JavaScript is actually a decent language in its own right. >> "The Good Parts" of it anyway. > Python, too, has its good parts, y

Re: JavaScript vs Python

2010-11-09 Thread Lawrence D'Oliveiro
In message , Chris Rebert wrote: > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro > wrote: > >> Because JavaScript is actually a decent language in its own right. > > "The Good Parts" of it anyway. Python, too, has its good parts, you have to admit... -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/l

Re: JavaScript vs Python (was Re: Commercial or Famous Applicattions.?)

2010-11-08 Thread Ian Kelly
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Chris Rebert wrote: > "The Good Parts" of it anyway. > > All hail William Goldman! Wait, what were talking about? Ian -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: JavaScript vs Python (was Re: Commercial or Famous Applicattions.?)

2010-11-08 Thread Chris Rebert
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > In message , John Bond > wrote: > >> On 9/11/2010 5:54 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>> In message, John Bond >>> wrote: >>> I once got asked to write a list things that I'd make different in the technology world if I could,

Re: JavaScript vs Python (was Re: Commercial or Famous Applicattions.?)

2010-11-08 Thread Lawrence D'Oliveiro
In message , John Bond wrote: > On 9/11/2010 5:54 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> In message, John Bond >> wrote: >> >>> I once got asked to write a list things that I'd make different in the >>> technology world if I could, to make it better for everyone. Number 3 >>> was "everywhere you now