On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 11:21 PM ferzan saglam wrote:
>
> Hi People, I am working on a simple calculator which uses operands (+-*/).
> The program allows me to choose an operand and enter the first two values,
> but when it gets to doing the maths, it gives me an error on
> "console.log ("The resu
dieter wrote:
> Once the problems to get the "final" HTML code solved,
> I would use "lxml" and its "xpath" support to locate any
> relevant HTML information.
Hello Dieter, yes - you are correct. (though I don't think there's any auth
to browse - nice that you actually tried) He's using jsonP an
Veek M writes:
> I tried scraping a javascript website using two tools, both didn't work. The
> website link is: http://xdguo.taobao.com/category-499399872.htm The relevant
> text I'm trying to extract is 'GY-68...':
>
>
>
>
>
> id="4002-6778075404" data-spm-anchor-i
On 09-11-2010 10:25, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> In message , Chris
> Rebert wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Because JavaScript is actually a decent language in its own right.
>> "The Good Parts" of it anyway.
> Python, too, has its good parts, y
In message , Chris
Rebert wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
> wrote:
>
>> Because JavaScript is actually a decent language in its own right.
>
> "The Good Parts" of it anyway.
Python, too, has its good parts, you have to admit...
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/l
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Chris Rebert wrote:
> "The Good Parts" of it anyway.
>
>
All hail William Goldman!
Wait, what were talking about?
Ian
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
wrote:
> In message , John Bond
> wrote:
>
>> On 9/11/2010 5:54 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>> In message, John Bond
>>> wrote:
>>>
I once got asked to write a list things that I'd make different in the
technology world if I could,
In message , John Bond
wrote:
> On 9/11/2010 5:54 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> In message, John Bond
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I once got asked to write a list things that I'd make different in the
>>> technology world if I could, to make it better for everyone. Number 3
>>> was "everywhere you now
On Jul 21, 12:55 pm, Paul Boddie wrote:
> On 20 Jul, 18:00, a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
>
>
>
> > Out of curiosity, are there anyJavaScripttoolkits that generate code
> > that degrades gracefully whenJavaScriptis disabled?
>
> You mean "Web toolkits which useJavaScript", I presume. I have
>
On Jul 20, 4:00 pm, a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
> Out of curiosity, are there anyJavaScripttoolkits
or python-to-javascript compilers
> that generate code
> that degrades gracefully whenJavaScriptis disabled?
http://advogato.org/article/981.html
you'll need to do a little bit of work
On 23 Jul, 05:55, a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
> In article
> <1c994086-8c58-488f-b3b3-6161c4b2b...@k30g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
> Paul Boddie wrote:
>
> >http://www.boddie.org.uk/python/XSLTools.html
>
> Thanks! I'll take a look after OSCON.
The JavaScript parts of the framework are a
In article <1c994086-8c58-488f-b3b3-6161c4b2b...@k30g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
Paul Boddie wrote:
>On 20 Jul, 18:00, a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
>>
>> Out of curiosity, are there any JavaScript toolkits that generate code
>> that degrades gracefully when JavaScript is disabled?
>
>You mea
In article ,
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
>On 20 Jul 2009 17:10:55 -0700
>a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
>>>I understand what you want but I can't see how a toolkit can do that.
>>>How do you program "graceful?" It seems pretty application specific.
>>
>> Presumably the JS toolkit generates both
On 20 Jul, 18:00, a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity, are there any JavaScript toolkits that generate code
> that degrades gracefully when JavaScript is disabled?
You mean "Web toolkits which use JavaScript", I presume. I have
written (and use myself) a toolkit/framework calle
On 20 Jul 2009 17:10:55 -0700
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
> >I understand what you want but I can't see how a toolkit can do that.
> >How do you program "graceful?" It seems pretty application specific.
>
> Presumably the JS toolkit generates both code and HTML. Actions that
> normally ge
In article ,
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
>On 20 Jul 2009 09:00:33 -0700
>a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
>>
>> Out of curiosity, are there any JavaScript toolkits that generate code
>> that degrades gracefully when JavaScript is disabled?
>
>I understand what you want but I can't see how a toolkit
On 20 Jul 2009 09:00:33 -0700
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
> Out of curiosity, are there any JavaScript toolkits that generate code
> that degrades gracefully when JavaScript is disabled?
I understand what you want but I can't see how a toolkit can do that.
How do you program "graceful?" It
lkcl a écrit :
On Oct 3, 10:29 am, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
lkcl a écrit :> On Oct 2, 7:42 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
lkcl a écrit :
And as far as I'm concerned, the point is
exactly here : it's doing "a little bit more" than the original code.
yeah, i know. a
> so, if i do this:
>
> d = dataListener()
> e = dataListener()
>
> d.data = "fred"
>
> print f.data
duh, duh - that should be print e.data :)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Oct 3, 10:29 am, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> lkcl a écrit :> On Oct 2, 7:42 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> lkcl a écrit :
> Not 'mine' - I'm not the OP.
whoops, yes - i missed that. sorry!
> And as far as I'm concerned, the point is
> exactly here : it's doing
lkcl a écrit :
On Oct 2, 7:42 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
lkcl a écrit :
(snip)
for fits and giggles, compile the above python using
pyjs.py, the python-to-javascript compiler
(seehttp://pyjamas.sf.net) and compare the
resultant javascript to your original code-fragment
On Oct 2, 7:42 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> lkcl a écrit :
>
>
>
> > On Oct 2, 5:54 pm, Joe Hrbek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Could someone help me translate to something that would close to it in
> >> python? The anonymous functions are giving me problems.
>
> > class
lkcl a écrit :
On Oct 2, 5:54 pm, Joe Hrbek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could someone help me translate to something that would close to it in
python? The anonymous functions are giving me problems.
class dataListener:
def __init__(self):
data = ""
def onStartRequest(self, req
Joe Hrbek a écrit :
Could someone help me translate to something that would close to it in
python? The anonymous functions are giving me problems.
var dataListener = {
data : "",
onStartRequest: function(request, context){},
onStopRequest: function(request, context, status
On Oct 2, 5:54 pm, Joe Hrbek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could someone help me translate to something that would close to it in
> python? The anonymous functions are giving me problems.
class dataListener:
def __init__(self):
data = ""
def onStartRequest(self, request, context)
Evren Esat Ozkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to encrypt a string with RSA. But it needs to be compitable
> with Dave's JavaScript RSA implementation*.
What exactly are you trying to do? That Javascript implementation
looks like bad news. If you're trying to secure a web page, use S
Hi,
Thank you very much. Your code is worked like a charm and saved my
honeymoon :)
Thanks again,
Evren
On Jul 4, 6:19 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Evren Esat Ozkan napisa³(a):
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hello,
>
> > I'm trying to encrypt a string with RSA. But it needs to be compitable
> > with Dave's Ja
Evren Esat Ozkan napisał(a):
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to encrypt a string with RSA. But it needs to be compitable
> with Dave's JavaScript RSA implementation*. I'm already read and tried
> lots of different things about RSA and RSA in Python. But could not
> produce the same result with the javascri
Hi!
I know "how to", but only with IE on windows.
--
@-salutations
Michel Claveau
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>python has modules for forms and other things... and for it?
Check out httplib and urlib2, it might be useful for you.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Steve Holden wrote:
> Wouldn't that be
>
> with f() as x, g() as y:
> blah(x, y)
or
with f(), g() as x, y:
pass
see guido's comment at the bottom of this page:
http://effbot.org/pyref/with.htm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wouldn't that be
>
> with f() as x, g() as y:
> blah(x, y)
Probably. I haven't started using 2.5 yet.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Paul Rubin wrote:
> "Carl Banks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/New_in_JavaScript_1.7
> > Maybe in exchange, Python can borrow the let statement.
>
> Maybe the with statement could be extended to allow binding more than
> one variable.
> with x as f(), y
Paul Rubin wrote:
> "Carl Banks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>>http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/New_in_JavaScript_1.7
>>
>>Maybe in exchange, Python can borrow the let statement.
>
>
> Maybe the with statement could be extended to allow binding more than
> one variable.
> with x as
"Carl Banks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/New_in_JavaScript_1.7
> Maybe in exchange, Python can borrow the let statement.
Maybe the with statement could be extended to allow binding more than
one variable.
with x as f(), y as g():
blah (x, y)
--
Paul Rubin wrote:
> I hadn't seem this before. New Javascript 1.7 features:
>
> - Generators
> - Iterators
> - Array comprehensions
> - Destructuring assignment
>
> Sounds like another language we know.
>
> http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/New_in_JavaScript_1.7
Maybe in exchange, Python can b
Hi!
> (ECMAscript), then, well I haven't seen any progress there.
1) in IE-7, the last release (of JScript) has few evolutions (more
important, a new garbage collector)
2) in Windows, with Active-Scripting, it's possible to integrate
JScript in Python, call JScript's functions from Python's co
Paul Rubin wrote:
> I hadn't seem this before. New Javascript 1.7 features:
>
> - Generators
> - Iterators
> - Array comprehensions
> - Destructuring assignment
>
> Sounds like another language we know.
>
> http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/New_in_JavaScript_1.7
Indeed, this is a consequence o
Paul Rubin <"http://phr.cx"@NOSPAM.invalid> writes:
> I hadn't seen this before. New Javascript 1.7 features:
> - Generators
> - Iterators
> - Array comprehensions
> - Destructuring assignment
>
> Sounds like another language we know.
The current developers of Javascript have been quite open dur
Paul Rubin wrote:
> I hadn't seen this before. New Javascript 1.7 features:
>
> - Generators
> - Iterators
> - Array comprehensions
> - Destructuring assignment
>
> Sounds like another language we know.
>
> http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/New_in_JavaScript_1.7
http://weblogs.mozillazine.
Paul Rubin wrote:
> [Correction of earlier accidental crosspost]
>
> I hadn't seen this before. New Javascript 1.7 features:
>
> - Generators
> - Iterators
> - Array comprehensions
> - Destructuring assignment
>
> Sounds like another language we know.
>
> http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/New_
[Correction of earlier accidental crosspost]
I hadn't seen this before. New Javascript 1.7 features:
- Generators
- Iterators
- Array comprehensions
- Destructuring assignment
Sounds like another language we know.
http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/New_in_JavaScript_1.7
--
http://mail.pytho
42 matches
Mail list logo
