Excellent, thank you.
http://bugs.python.org/issue14573
-alfred
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Alfred Morgan wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 3:55:19 PM UTC-7, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> At some point, you'll have to port your patch to the latest codebase
>
> Okay, done.
>
> https://github.com/Zectbumo/cpython/compare/master
>
> Iterators for JSON is now
On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 3:55:19 PM UTC-7, Chris Angelico wrote:
> At some point, you'll have to port your patch to the latest codebase
Okay, done.
https://github.com/Zectbumo/cpython/compare/master
Iterators for JSON is now Python 3 ready.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytho
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Alfred Morgan wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 6:07:23 AM UTC-7, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Alfred Morgan wrote:
>> > What do you think now?
>>
>> I think that you're adding features to Python 2.7, which isn't getting
>> new featu
On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 6:07:23 AM UTC-7, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Alfred Morgan wrote:
> > What do you think now?
>
> I think that you're adding features to Python 2.7, which isn't getting
> new features. That won't be merged into trunk. Does your patch apply
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Alfred Morgan wrote:
> I added a stream flag (off by default) and also added file streaming (thanks
> for the idea).
>
> https://github.com/Zectbumo/cpython/compare/2.7
>
> What do you think now?
I think that you're adding features to Python 2.7, which isn't getti
On Monday, September 29, 2014 7:10:18 PM UTC-7, Ian wrote:
> This would cause things that aren't lists to be encoded as lists.
> Sometimes that may be desirable, but in general if e.g. a file object
> sneaks its way into your JSON encode call, it is more likely correct
> to raise an error than to s
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 7:19 PM, wrote:
> I would like to add the ability to JSONEncode large iterators. Right now
> there is no way to do this without modifying the code.
>
> The JSONEncoder.default() doc string suggests to do this:
> For example, to support arbitrary iterators, you cou
