Re: IDLE is not as interactive as Maple

2009-08-20 Thread laser
Thanks very much for your information. Reinteract looks like exactly what I want. It give me the similary feeling of using Maple. I like this kind of programming style. People who did not have this experience really should take a try. On 8月20日, 下午9时11分, André wrote: > On Aug 20, 12:22 am, laser

Re: IDLE is not as interactive as Maple

2009-08-20 Thread sturlamolden
On 19 Aug, 20:22, laser wrote: > In the future, will Python provide programe enviroment like Maple > does? You might be looking for SAGE. http://www.sagemath.org/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: IDLE is not as interactive as Maple

2009-08-20 Thread Benjamin Kaplan
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:22 PM, laser wrote: > In the future, will Python provide programe enviroment like Maple > does? In Maple, you can remove anything unneeded in the editor. And > the code execution order are not necessary in one direction. You can > run any command line on the screen by > p

Re: IDLE is not as interactive as Maple

2009-08-20 Thread André
On Aug 20, 12:22 am, laser wrote: > In the future, will Python provide programe enviroment like Maple > does? A quick, flip answer: perhaps if you design one? Tools for Python are designed by people scratching an itch. That being said, have a look at reinteract: http://www.reinteract.org/trac/w