In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to make things simpler, and (;-) to appeal to a wider audience,
> here is a program that doesn't use database at all (it loads the entire
> standard library into a dict) and still shows the error.
>
> What *I* would
Steve Holden wrote:
Peter Otten wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
This is even stranger: it makes it if I import the module a second time:
[second import seems to succeed]
Maybe you are experiencing some version confusion? What you describe
looks
much like the normal Python 2.3 behaviour (with no impor
Peter Otten wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
This is even stranger: it makes it if I import the module a second time:
[second import seems to succeed]
Maybe you are experiencing some version confusion? What you describe looks
much like the normal Python 2.3 behaviour (with no import hook involved)
wher
Steve Holden wrote:
> This is even stranger: it makes it if I import the module a second time:
[second import seems to succeed]
Maybe you are experiencing some version confusion? What you describe looks
much like the normal Python 2.3 behaviour (with no import hook involved)
whereas you seem to
