bgs wrote:
>Hmm, it looks like the dot operator has been overloaded to do something
>complicated. (although if you haven't already, try "for i in nodes:
>pass" just to make sure). Is it retrieving the data from the network
>
>
I tried that (the pass), that runs fast as it should
>somewhere?
Hmm, it looks like the dot operator has been overloaded to do something
complicated. (although if you haven't already, try "for i in nodes:
pass" just to make sure). Is it retrieving the data from the network
somewhere? If so, then it looks like it is probably retrieving each
coordinate individu
bgs wrote:
>There's no way that loop takes fifteen minutes just because of the dot
>operator. I mean, 20 dots in 15 minutes is 200 dots/second. On a
>1 GHz machine, that would be 5 million cycles per dot. That does not
>seem reasonable (assuming you haven't overridden the dot operator to d
There's no way that loop takes fifteen minutes just because of the dot
operator. I mean, 20 dots in 15 minutes is 200 dots/second. On a
1 GHz machine, that would be 5 million cycles per dot. That does not
seem reasonable (assuming you haven't overridden the dot operator to do
something more
