On Feb 15, 11:43 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Feb 15, 8:04 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hold the future holds effectively nothing for single-threaded
> > programs; single-core PUs have reached the point of diminishing
> > returns of circuit size and IC design; thinking multi-threaded's t
On Feb 15, 8:04 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hold the future holds effectively nothing for single-threaded
> programs; single-core PUs have reached the point of diminishing
> returns of circuit size and IC design; thinking multi-threaded's the
> way to go.
>
> Recognizing that even in event-drive
