En Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:40:14 -0200, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Skipping past html validation, and html to xhtml 'cleaning', and
> instead starting with the assumption that I have files that are valid
> XHTML, can anyone give me a good example of how I would use _ htmllib,
> HTMLParser
On Jan 23, 2008 7:40 AM, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Skipping past html validation, and html to xhtml 'cleaning', and
> instead starting with the assumption that I have files that are valid
> XHTML, can anyone give me a good example of how I would use _ htmllib,
> HTMLParser, or ElementTre
On Jan 23, 3:54 am, "M.-A. Lemburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I was asking this community if there was a simple way to use only the
> >> tools included with Python to parse a bit of html.
>
> There are lots of ways doing HTML parsing in Python. A common
> one is e.g. using mxTidy to convert
> The pages I'm trying to write this code to run against aren't in the
> wild, though. They are static html files on my company's lan, are very
> consistent in format, and are (I believe) valid html.
Obvious way to check this is to go to http://validator.w3.org/ and see
what it tells you about you
On 2008-01-23 01:29, Gabriel Genellina wrote:
> En Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:20:32 -0200, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
>> On Jan 22, 11:39 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Alnilam wrote:
On Jan 22, 8:44 am, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Pardon me, but the
On Jan 22, 7:29 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > I was asking this community if there was a simple way to use only the
> > tools included with Python to parse a bit of html.
>
> If you *know* that your document is valid HTML, you can use the HTMLParser
> module in the stan
On Jan 22, 7:29 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > I was asking this community if there was a simple way to use only the
> > tools included with Python to parse a bit of html.
>
> If you *know* that your document is valid HTML, you can use the HTMLParser
> module in the stand
En Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:20:32 -0200, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Jan 22, 11:39 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Alnilam wrote:
>> > On Jan 22, 8:44 am, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > Pardon me, but the standard issue Python 2.n (for n in range(5, 2,
>>
On Jan 22, 11:39 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alnilam wrote:
> > On Jan 22, 8:44 am, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Pardon me, but the standard issue Python 2.n (for n in range(5, 2,
> >> > -1)) doesn't have an xml.dom.ext ... you must have the mega-monstrous
> >>
Alnilam wrote:
> On Jan 22, 8:44 am, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Pardon me, but the standard issue Python 2.n (for n in range(5, 2,
>> > -1)) doesn't have an xml.dom.ext ... you must have the mega-monstrous
>> > 200-modules PyXML package installed. And you don't want the 75Kb
>> > Beau
On Jan 22, 8:44 am, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Pardon me, but the standard issue Python 2.n (for n in range(5, 2,
> > -1)) doesn't have an xml.dom.ext ... you must have the mega-monstrous
> > 200-modules PyXML package installed. And you don't want the 75Kb
> > BeautifulSoup?
>
> I wasn'
On Jan 22, 7:44 am, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I move from computer to
> computer regularly, and while all have a recent copy of Python, each
> has different (or no) extra modules, and I don't always have the
> luxury of downloading extras. That being said, if there's a simple way
> of
> Pardon me, but the standard issue Python 2.n (for n in range(5, 2,
> -1)) doesn't have an xml.dom.ext ... you must have the mega-monstrous
> 200-modules PyXML package installed. And you don't want the 75Kb
> BeautifulSoup?
I wasn't aware that I had PyXML installed, and can't find a reference
to
On 22 Jan, 06:31, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for the noob question, but I've gone through the documentation
> on python.org, tried some of the diveintopython and boddie's examples,
> and looked through some of the numerous posts in this group on the
> subject and I'm still rather co
On Jan 22, 4:31 pm, Alnilam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for the noob question, but I've gone through the documentation
> on python.org, tried some of the diveintopython and boddie's examples,
> and looked through some of the numerous posts in this group on the
> subject and I'm still rather
15 matches
Mail list logo
