On Sep 16, 10:29 pm, Steven D'Aprano
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:52:13 +1200, greg wrote:
> > Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
>
> >> Or:
>
> >> import ModuleName as this_module
>
> > Or:
>
> > this_module = __import__(__name__)
>
> > then you don't have to change anything.
>
> I lik
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:52:13 +1200, greg wrote:
> Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
>
>> Or:
>>
>> import ModuleName as this_module
>
> Or:
>
> this_module = __import__(__name__)
>
> then you don't have to change anything.
I like that solution! And it works regardless of whether the module
holding i
Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
Or:
import ModuleName as this_module
Or:
this_module = __import__(__name__)
then you don't have to change anything.
--
Greg
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sep 14, 5:10 pm, "Aaron \"Castironpi\" Brady"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 14, 4:43 am, Arnaud Delobelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 14, 10:29 am, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> > > I have a function that needs a reference to the modu
On Sep 14, 4:43 am, Arnaud Delobelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 14, 10:29 am, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> > I have a function that needs a reference to the module object it is
> > defined in. (For the reason why, if you care, see the thread "doct
On Sep 14, 10:29 am, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> I have a function that needs a reference to the module object it is
> defined in. (For the reason why, if you care, see the thread "doctest not
> seeing any of my doc tests" from a week ago.) I know of two ways to
