Pypy aims to become (probably sometime next year) a strong candidate to
replace cpython as the main python implementation.
Its goals are very ambicious and one of them is making it fast.
Some of its developers even think it can get as fast as C, although I
think that if it can get as fast as java,
Hi Terry.
I see:
http://codespeak.net/pypy/dist/pypy/doc/news.html
"...by translating RPython to Javascript..."
It isn't an implementation.
--
JavaScript implementation of Python
http://groups.google.it/group/JSython/
Terry Hancock ha scritto:
> . wrote:
>
> > What is the fast way for a fast
. wrote:
> What is the fast way for a fast implementation of Python?
>
> -- JavaScript implementation of Python
> http://groups.google.it/group/JSython/
Follow the PyPy link. The other replies were about increasing
execution speed, not ease of implementation.
Implement the "RPython" part in
. wrote:
> What is the fast way for a fast implementation of Python?
>
> --
> JavaScript implementation of Python
> http://groups.google.it/group/JSython/
Check this out:
http://codespeak.net/pypy/dist/pypy/doc/news.html
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Alex Martelli wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Psyco does some JIT compiling of Python, supposedly making it faster.
> > You do need to think a bit, however, beforehand.
> > If you really thing that the "speed" of execution is important for your
> > application, a script
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Psyco does some JIT compiling of Python, supposedly making it faster.
> You do need to think a bit, however, beforehand.
> If you really thing that the "speed" of execution is important for your
> application, a scripting language such as python may b
Psyco does some JIT compiling of Python, supposedly making it faster.
You do need to think a bit, however, beforehand.
If you really thing that the "speed" of execution is important for your
application, a scripting language such as python may be the wrong tool.
A language such as C++ or Java whic
. wrote:
> What is the fast way for a fast implementation of Python?
Please define "fast".
--
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for
p in '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.split('@')])"
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
