On May 2, 4:49 pm, Mensanator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 2, 2:57 pm, George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 2, 1:18 pm, Mensanator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On May 2, 9:53 am, Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Shawn Milochik wrote:
> > > > > Ho
On May 2, 2:57 pm, George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 2, 1:18 pm, Mensanator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On May 2, 9:53 am, Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Shawn Milochik wrote:
> > > > How does one "plonk" stuff from Google Groups? Specifically, how
> > > > ca
On May 2, 2:26 pm, Arnaud Delobelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mensanator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On May 2, 1:20 pm, Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Mensanator wrote:
> >> > On May 2, 9:53 am, Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> Shawn Milochik wrote:
> >> >>>
On May 2, 1:18 pm, Mensanator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 2, 9:53 am, Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Shawn Milochik wrote:
> > > How does one "plonk" stuff from Google Groups? Specifically, how
> > > can this be done in Gmail?
>
> > Set up a filter that looks for some phras
Mensanator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On May 2, 1:20 pm, Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Mensanator wrote:
>> > On May 2, 9:53 am, Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Shawn Milochik wrote:
>> >>> How does one "plonk" stuff from Google Groups? Specifically, how
>> >>> ca
On May 2, 1:20 pm, Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mensanator wrote:
> > On May 2, 9:53 am, Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Shawn Milochik wrote:
> >>> How does one "plonk" stuff from Google Groups? Specifically, how
> >>> can this be done in Gmail?
> >> Set up a filter t
Mensanator wrote:
> On May 2, 9:53 am, Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Shawn Milochik wrote:
>>> How does one "plonk" stuff from Google Groups? Specifically, how
>>> can this be done in Gmail?
>> Set up a filter that looks for some phrase in the mail headers that
>> identifies messages
On May 2, 9:53 am, Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn Milochik wrote:
> > How does one "plonk" stuff from Google Groups? Specifically, how
> > can this be done in Gmail?
>
> Set up a filter that looks for some phrase in the mail headers that
> identifies messages originating from goo
Shawn Milochik wrote:
> How does one "plonk" stuff from Google Groups? Specifically, how
> can this be done in Gmail?
Set up a filter that looks for some phrase in the mail headers that
identifies messages originating from google groups. Gmail's filters are
fairly flexible. I'd probably just hav
How does one "plonk" stuff from Google Groups? Specifically, how
can this be done in Gmail?
Thanks,
Shawn
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hallöchen!
NickC writes:
> Hmm, according to this thread I probably shouldn't bother even
> trying to contribute to c.l.p discussions that are highlighted in
> the Python- URL announcements, even in cases where I think a core
> developer's perspective may be of interest. As someone that only
> po
Hmm, according to this thread I probably shouldn't bother even trying
to contribute to c.l.p discussions that are highlighted in the Python-
URL announcements, even in cases where I think a core developer's
perspective may be of interest. As someone that only posts here
rarely, and uses Google Grou
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>This morning almost half of c.l.p was spam. In order to try to not tar
>both the benign google group users and the malignant ones with the same
>brush, I've been trying to kill usenet spam with subject patterns. But
>tha
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mike Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>My workplace doesn't offer NNTP, so there is no good way to browse
>c.l.py here. And I haven't been able to get NNTP to work from my home
>either.
Can you use ssh? Get a shell account somewhere else.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PRO
"Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
En Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:23:57 -0300, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> Torsten Bronger wrote:
>> The admistrative overhead of mailing lists is tedious. Fortunately,
>> most important computer-related list
En Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:23:57 -0300, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Torsten Bronger wrote:
>> The admistrative overhead of mailing lists is tedious. Fortunately,
>> most important computer-related lists are on gmane.org. We could
>> list c.l.py there, too. ;-)
>>
> c.l.py has been
Mike Driscoll wrote:
> I'm confused. First you say Gmail is create for filtering and then you
> say it has a broken interface. I like Gmail for some things, but my
> inability to create folders is one thing that really bugs me. I can
> set up Thunderbird to accept mail from Gmail and do it that way
On 2008-04-17, Dennis Lee Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:19:37 -0500, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> declaimed the following in comp.lang.python:
>
>> I broke down and joined all the other people that just killfile
>> everything posted via google.groups.
>
> Unfortu
On 2008-04-17, John Salerno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>> This morning almost half of c.l.p was spam. In order to try to
>> not tar both the benign google group users and the malignant
>> ones with the same brush, I've been trying to kill usenet spam
>> with subject patterns
Grant Edwards wrote:
> This morning almost half of c.l.p was spam. In order to try to
> not tar both the benign google group users and the malignant
> ones with the same brush, I've been trying to kill usenet spam
> with subject patterns. But that's not a battle you can win, so
> I broke down and
On Apr 17, 1:14 am, Mike Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 10:26 am, Mike Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I noticed that Google Groups has really sucked this week. I'm
> > using the Google Groups Killfile for Greasemonkey now and it helps a
> > lot. I like Google, but my
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Mike Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think I like the email list idea all that much. I'm already on
> a number of them and they fill up my box like crazy. Besides that, in
> email format it's hard to follow the thread, so one moment I'm reading
> abo
On Apr 16, 1:43 pm, Severian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
> > On 2008-04-16, Mensanator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Apr 16, 9:19 am, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> This morning almost half of c.l.p was spam. In order to try
> >>> to not tar both the beni
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2008-04-16, Mensanator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Apr 16, 9:19 am, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> This morning almost half of c.l.p was spam. In order to try
>>> to not tar both the benign google group users and the
>>> malignant ones with the same bru
On Apr 16, 11:06 am, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not saying people shouldn't use Google Groups. I'm saying that
> Google can "justify" providing customer "support" that lives somewhere
> between zero and extremely crappy by not charging for the service.
It's even worse than that
On 2008-04-16, Mensanator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 9:19 am, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This morning almost half of c.l.p was spam. In order to try
>> to not tar both the benign google group users and the
>> malignant ones with the same brush, I've been trying to kil
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 10:49 -0700, Mike Driscoll wrote:
> On Apr 16, 12:40 pm, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> > Mike Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > My workplace doesn't offer NNTP, so there is no good way to browse
> > > c
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 12:06 -0400, Steve Holden wrote:
> Mike Driscoll wrote:
> > On Apr 16, 10:09 am, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Mike Driscoll wrote:
> >>> On Apr 16, 9:19 am, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This morning almost half of c.l.p was spam. In order to
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Mike Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 12:40 pm, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't think I like the email list idea all that much. I'm already on
> a number of them and they fill up my box like crazy. Besides that, in
> emai
Hallöchen!
D'Arcy J.M. Cain writes:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:11:09 -0700
> "Daniel Fetchinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Full disclosure: I'm using google groups for both reading and
>> writing.
>
> You are?
Maybe, but not with this posting. It was sent through the mailing
list.
By the w
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:39:16 -0600
Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Running a few lists myself, I don't see this. How is administrative
> overhead tedious? Most open source projects do it, so I wonder just how
> tedious it is. Of all the projects I'm associated with in lists, Python
>
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:11:09 -0700
"Daniel Fetchinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Full disclosure: I'm using google groups for both reading and writing.
You are? I guess I don't have my filter set correctly then. Can
someone please tell me what headers indicate that it is a Google groups
posti
On Apr 16, 11:06 am, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Driscoll wrote:
> > On Apr 16, 10:09 am, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Mike Driscoll wrote:
> >>> On Apr 16, 9:19 am, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This morning almost half of c.l.p was spam. In or
On Apr 16, 12:40 pm, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
>
> Mike Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My workplace doesn't offer NNTP, so there is no good way to browse
> > c.l.py here. And I haven't been able to get NNTP to work from my home
On Apr 16, 9:19 am, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This morning almost half of c.l.p was spam. In order to try to
> not tar both the benign google group users and the malignant
> ones with the same brush, I've been trying to kill usenet spam
> with subject patterns. But that's not a b
Hallöchen!
Steve Holden writes:
> Torsten Bronger wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> The admistrative overhead of mailing lists is tedious.
>> Fortunately, most important computer-related lists are on
>> gmane.org. We could list c.l.py there, too. ;-)
>
> c.l.py has been on gmane for years, as comp.python
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
Mike Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My workplace doesn't offer NNTP, so there is no good way to browse
> c.l.py here. And I haven't been able to get NNTP to work from my home
> either.
Hi Mike;
I am half way to killing Google groups myself. Your me
Torsten Bronger wrote:
> Hallöchen!
>
> Michael Torrie writes:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> This official python list is one of the few lists that's even
>> still on nntp. All my other ones (gnome, gtk, openldap, clamav,
>> freeradius, etc) are all e-mail mailing lists only and it works
>> very well. In fa
Hallöchen!
Michael Torrie writes:
> Torsten Bronger wrote:
>
>> The admistrative overhead of mailing lists is tedious.
>> Fortunately, most important computer-related lists are on
>> gmane.org. We could list c.l.py there, too. ;-)
>
> Running a few lists myself, I don't see this. How is
> admi
On 2008-04-16, Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> My workplace doesn't offer NNTP, so there is no good way to browse
>> c.l.py here.
Browse it via the mailing list using gmane.org. There are no
ads and your postings won't get plonked by everybody.
>> And I haven't been able to get NNT
Torsten Bronger wrote:
> The admistrative overhead of mailing lists is tedious. Fortunately,
> most important computer-related lists are on gmane.org. We could
> list c.l.py there, too. ;-)
Running a few lists myself, I don't see this. How is administrative
overhead tedious? Most open source
Hallöchen!
Michael Torrie writes:
> [...]
>
> This official python list is one of the few lists that's even
> still on nntp. All my other ones (gnome, gtk, openldap, clamav,
> freeradius, etc) are all e-mail mailing lists only and it works
> very well. In fact, I think it's much better since li
Mike Driscoll wrote:
> Steve,
>
> My workplace doesn't offer NNTP, so there is no good way to browse
> c.l.py here. And I haven't been able to get NNTP to work from my home
> either.
I rarely use NNTP these days. I access c.l.py exclusively via e-mail,
and that works very well. In some cases th
> > > On Apr 16, 9:19 am, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> This morning almost half of c.l.p was spam. In order to try to
> > >> not tar both the benign google group users and the malignant
> > >> ones with the same brush, I've been trying to kill usenet spam
> > >> with subject pat
Mike Driscoll wrote:
> On Apr 16, 10:09 am, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Mike Driscoll wrote:
>>> On Apr 16, 9:19 am, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This morning almost half of c.l.p was spam. In order to try to
not tar both the benign google group users and the m
On Apr 16, 10:09 am, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Driscoll wrote:
> > On Apr 16, 9:19 am, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> This morning almost half of c.l.p was spam. In order to try to
> >> not tar both the benign google group users and the malignant
> >> ones with
On 2008-04-16, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But that's not a battle you can win, so I broke down and joined all
> the other people that just killfile everything posted via google.groups.
I did the same about an hour ago.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Apr 16, 10:26 am, Mike Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, I noticed that Google Groups has really sucked this week. I'm
> using the Google Groups Killfile for Greasemonkey now and it helps a
> lot. I like Google, but my loyalty only goes to far. This is a
> complete lack of customer se
Mike Driscoll wrote:
> On Apr 16, 9:19 am, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This morning almost half of c.l.p was spam. In order to try to
>> not tar both the benign google group users and the malignant
>> ones with the same brush, I've been trying to kill usenet spam
>> with subject pa
On Apr 16, 9:19 am, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This morning almost half of c.l.p was spam. In order to try to
> not tar both the benign google group users and the malignant
> ones with the same brush, I've been trying to kill usenet spam
> with subject patterns. But that's not a b
50 matches
Mail list logo
