On 3/07/2006 10:01 PM, Jon Clements wrote:
> John Machin wrote:
> (snip)
>> You have already been told: you don't need "self.", you just write
>> "self" ... self *is* a reference to the instance of the mystr class that
>> is being operated on by the substr method.
>>
> (snip)
>
> I get that; let m
John Machin wrote:
(snip)
>
> You have already been told: you don't need "self.", you just write
> "self" ... self *is* a reference to the instance of the mystr class that
> is being operated on by the substr method.
>
(snip)
I get that; let me clarify why I asked again.
As far as I'm aware, the
On 3/07/2006 7:55 PM, Jon Clements wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> My experiance is mostly with old-style classes, but here goes.
>>
>> first off, the question is actually easier than you think.
>> After all, self is an instance of a string, so self[3:4] would grab
>> the slice of character
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My experiance is mostly with old-style classes, but here goes.
>
> first off, the question is actually easier than you think.
> After all, self is an instance of a string, so self[3:4] would grab
> the slice of characters between 3 and 4 =)
>
That's kind of funky - I
My experiance is mostly with old-style classes, but here goes.
first off, the question is actually easier than you think.
After all, self is an instance of a string, so self[3:4] would grab
the slice of characters between 3 and 4 =)
as for __init__, what I have found is that if you do not incl
