On Jun 17, 10:32 am, Aaron Brady wrote:
> On Jun 17, 10:23 am, Mensanator wrote:
snip
> > > I think high and low /voltages/, though continuous and approximate,
> > > might satisfy this.
>
> > > There are no such things as electrons,
>
> > I've got a Tesla coil if you'd like to meet some electrons
Michael Torrie wrote:
William Clifford wrote:
I've read one can do all of the 16 binary operations with clever uses
of NAND or NOR.
That is correct. In fact semiconductor logic is done using these two
principle gates. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAND_logic . Quite
interesting
William Clifford wrote:
> I've read one can do all of the 16 binary operations with clever uses
> of NAND or NOR.
That is correct. In fact semiconductor logic is done using these two
principle gates. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAND_logic . Quite
interesting really.
--
http://mail.python
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:37:04 +, Lie Ryan wrote:
>> Imagine for a moment that there are no boolean values. There are no
>> numbers. They were never invented. There are no classes.
>> There are no objects.
>> There are only functions.
>>
>> Could you define functions that act like boolean valu
Quoting Lie Ryan :
> pdpi wrote:
> > On Jun 17, 5:37 pm, Lie Ryan wrote:
> >> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:46:14 -0700, William Clifford wrote:
> I was staring at a logic table the other day, and I asked myself, "what
> if one wanted to play with exotic logics; h
pdpi wrote:
> On Jun 17, 5:37 pm, Lie Ryan wrote:
>> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:46:14 -0700, William Clifford wrote:
I was staring at a logic table the other day, and I asked myself, "what
if one wanted to play with exotic logics; how might one do it?"
>>> This mig
William Clifford wrote:
same (or different) results. I've read one can do all of the 16
binary
operations with clever uses of NAND or NOR.
The book Laws of Form, by Spencer-Brown' is based on that observation,
with nand/nor expanded to n-ary 'bag' functions (like sum() is).
I recommend it, e
On Jun 17, 1:28 am, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:46:14 -0700, William Clifford wrote:
> > I was staring at a logic table the other day, and I asked myself, "what
> > if one wanted to play with exotic logics; how might one do it?"
>
> First question: what's an exotic logics?
>
>
On Jun 17, 10:23 am, Mensanator wrote:
> On Jun 17, 11:59 am, Aaron Brady wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 17, 1:44 am, Steven D'Aprano
>
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:46:14 -0700, William Clifford wrote:
> > > > I was staring at a logic table the other day, and I asked myself, "what
> > > > if
On Jun 17, 10:05 am, pdpi wrote:
> On Jun 17, 5:37 pm, Lie Ryan wrote:
>
>
>
> > Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > > On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:46:14 -0700, William Clifford wrote:
>
> > >> I was staring at a logic table the other day, and I asked myself, "what
> > >> if one wanted to play with exotic logic
On Jun 17, 11:59 am, Aaron Brady wrote:
> On Jun 17, 1:44 am, Steven D'Aprano
>
>
>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:46:14 -0700, William Clifford wrote:
> > > I was staring at a logic table the other day, and I asked myself, "what
> > > if one wanted to play with exotic logics; how might one
On Jun 17, 10:04 am, Aaron Brady wrote:
snip
> You (OP) may be interested in the definitions of the fuzzy operators:
>
> and( x, y ) := min( x, y )
> or( x, y ) := max( x, y )
> not( x ) := 1 (one)- x
> nand( x, y ) := not( and( x, y ) ) = 1- min( x, y )
>
> Defining 'xor' as '( x or y ) and ( not
On Jun 17, 5:37 pm, Lie Ryan wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:46:14 -0700, William Clifford wrote:
>
> >> I was staring at a logic table the other day, and I asked myself, "what
> >> if one wanted to play with exotic logics; how might one do it?"
>
> > This might be usefu
On Jun 17, 1:28 am, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:46:14 -0700, William Clifford wrote:
> > I was staring at a logic table the other day, and I asked myself, "what
> > if one wanted to play with exotic logics; how might one do it?"
>
> First question: what's an exotic logics?
>
>
On Jun 17, 1:44 am, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:46:14 -0700, William Clifford wrote:
> > I was staring at a logic table the other day, and I asked myself, "what
> > if one wanted to play with exotic logics; how might one do it?"
>
> This might be useful for you, and if not usef
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:46:14 -0700, William Clifford wrote:
>
>> I was staring at a logic table the other day, and I asked myself, "what
>> if one wanted to play with exotic logics; how might one do it?"
>
>
> This might be useful for you, and if not useful, at least it
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:46:14 -0700, William Clifford wrote:
> I was staring at a logic table the other day, and I asked myself, "what
> if one wanted to play with exotic logics; how might one do it?"
This might be useful for you, and if not useful, at least it might blow
your mind like it did m
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:46:14 -0700, William Clifford wrote:
> I was staring at a logic table the other day, and I asked myself, "what
> if one wanted to play with exotic logics; how might one do it?"
First question: what's an exotic logics?
Do you mean things like three-value logic, fuzzy logic
18 matches
Mail list logo
