Steve Holden wrote:
> Unfortunately the overhead of supporting distribution is way too high to
> want to invoke it between two objects living in the same process.
Well I was thinking along the lines of "object" and "proxy-object" where a
proxy object is a handle to a remote object. Sending a pro
Martin Drautzburg wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've seen various attempts to add distributed computing capabilities on top
> of an existing language. For a true distributed system I would expect it to
> be possible to instantiate objects of a remote class or to subclass a
> remote class and other stuff
Martin Drautzburg schrieb:
> Hello all,
>
> I've seen various attempts to add distributed computing capabilities on top
> of an existing language. For a true distributed system I would expect it to
> be possible to instantiate objects of a remote class or to subclass a
> remote class and other stu
"Martin Drautzburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've seen various attempts to add distributed computing capabilities on top
> of an existing language. For a true distributed system I would expect it to
> be possible to instantiate objects of a remote class or to subclass a
> remot
See here:
http://wiki.python.org/moin/DistributedProgramming
-Nick V.
Martin Drautzburg wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've seen various attempts to add distributed computing capabilities on top
> of an existing language. For a true distributed system I would expect it to
> be possible to instantiate o
