On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:27:28 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> The chances are that whatever you want to do with dynamically created
> properties is better done with __getattr__ and __setattr__ instead.
Rather than post my own comment, I'd like to highlight this, emphasize it,
and underline it twice. T
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 06:43 -0800, michael wrote:
> setattr (self, key, property (fget, fset, fdel))
> it gives me
>
>
>
> What am I doing wrong here
Properties must be defined in the class, not the instance, to work as
expected. (Edit: Nick Coghlan explained this more accurately).
You can
michael wrote:
My first try is :
fget = lambda self: mygetattr(self, attrname)
fset = lambda self, value: mysetattr (self, attrname, value)
fdel = lambda self: mydelattr(self, attrname)
# fget, fset, fdel are used to reconstruct the byte field
setattr (self, key, property (fget, fset, fdel))
setatt
