Mike D wrote:
> Steve,
>
> You raise some very good (and obvious) issues I did'nt consider. I'll
> look further into this sort of implementation as I'm quite interested.
>
> I suppose a compromise could be to load the objects from a pickle, that
> may have issues in terms of updating the pickle
Steve,
You raise some very good (and obvious) issues I did'nt consider. I'll look
further into this sort of implementation as I'm quite interested.
I suppose a compromise could be to load the objects from a pickle, that may
have issues in terms of updating the pickle perhaps, though it would be m
Mike D wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Thanks for the response. My question really comes down to, as you
> suggested, premature optimization.
>
> It is more for my own understanding than a current practical use.
>
> If an object is loaded into memory and other threads(or processes) can
> recieve a pointer
Steve,
Thanks for the response. My question really comes down to, as you suggested,
premature optimization.
It is more for my own understanding than a current practical use.
If an object is loaded into memory and other threads(or processes) can
recieve a pointer to this location, would this not
Mike D wrote:
> Hello, I've just picked up the Python language and am really enjoying it.
>
> I've just signed up to this mailing list and I'm looking forward to
> taking part in some discussions.
>
> My first post is a question I've been pondering for the last couple of days:
>
> For relativel
