On 9 May 2015 at 13:56, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> Yeah, I know, shocking. But I wanted to at least *try* doing the
> normal and official thing, in the hopes that they were a legit company
> that perhaps didn't realize what this looked like.
>
By all means report to abuse@ in the future, but plea
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Sat, 9 May 2015 09:02 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> Thanks, that saves me the trouble of wondering if they'll deal with
>> it. Flag as spam, folks, flag as spam. They breach protocol by not
>> accepting abuse@.
>
> OMG, you mean spammer
On Sat, 9 May 2015 09:02 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Thanks, that saves me the trouble of wondering if they'll deal with
> it. Flag as spam, folks, flag as spam. They breach protocol by not
> accepting abuse@.
OMG, you mean spammers ignore long standing Internet conventions for dealing
with misus
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Mail Delivery Subsystem
wrote:
> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>
> ab...@intsystech.com
>
> Technical details of permanent failure:
> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for
> the recipient domain i
administrata wrote:
> Hello. I was about to use tutor-mailing But, When i send to
> tutor@python.org
That just means that somebody subscribed to that list isn't reachable.
Ignore it.
> Plz HELP me;
Please start talking english. This is no l337-script-kiddie forum.
--
Regards,
Diez B. Roggisc
