On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:19:25 +1200 in comp.lang.python, Lawrence
D'Oliveiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>"Sybren Stuvel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>> > I don't care about how people see my tabs. I use one tab for ever
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Ben Sizer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Every day I come across people or programs that use tab stops every 2
>>or 8 columns. I am another fan of tabs every 4 columns, but
>>unfortunately this isn't standard, so spaces in Python it is
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Sybren Stuvel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> > I don't care about how people see my tabs. I use one tab for every
>> indent level, so no matter how you set your tab width, my code will
>> look consistent.
>
>Unless they v
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Ben Sizer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> "Carl Banks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >Always use spaces when posting, and use them in your code as well.
>> >Spaces are the current recommended practi
"Sybren Stuvel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> I don't care about how people see my tabs. I use one tab for every
> indent level, so no matter how you set your tab width, my code will
> look consistent.
Unless they view with tab_width = 0, as with some news readers.
tjr
--
http://mail.pyth
Ben Sizer enlightened us with:
> Every day I come across people or programs that use tab stops every
> 2 or 8 columns. I am another fan of tabs every 4 columns, but
> unfortunately this isn't standard, so spaces in Python it is.
I don't care about how people see my tabs. I use one tab for every
in
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Carl Banks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Always use spaces when posting, and use them in your code as well.
> >Spaces are the current recommended practice, and in the future tabs
> >might become illegal. I'd prefer tabs myself, bu
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:05:22 +1200, rumours say that Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> might have written:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Roy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>One of the most basic
>>maxims on the Internet has always been, "Be liberal in what you accept, be
>>conser
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Roy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>One of the most basic
>maxims on the Internet has always been, "Be liberal in what you accept, be
>conservative in what you produce".
How do you explain top-posting, then?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-l
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Carl Banks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Always use spaces when posting, and use them in your code as well.
>Spaces are the current recommended practice, and in the future tabs
>might become illegal. I'd prefer tabs myself, but it's more important
>to respect comm
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 11:42:34 -0300, rumours say that Jorge Godoy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> might have written:
>Indeed. This is correct. Fredrick's comment was related to the lack of
>indentation in your code.
His code was indented fine, as you maybe noticed later on. The actual
problem was that he
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 08:52:18 -0700, Carl Banks wrote:
>
> > it's more important
> > to respect community standards than to stick to some silly preference
> > you have.
>
> What happens when the community standard is a silly preference? I object
> to the suggestion that "c
Felipe Almeida Lessa wrote:
> Em Dom, 2006-04-09 às 08:52 -0700, Carl Banks escreveu:
> > You've made the unfortunate mistake of indenting it with tabs, which
> > do
> > not show up on some newsreaders. I see the tabs in Google; people
> > using Microsoft Outlook do not.
>
> He does not need to k
Em Dom, 2006-04-09 às 08:52 -0700, Carl Banks escreveu:
> You've made the unfortunate mistake of indenting it with tabs, which
> do
> not show up on some newsreaders. I see the tabs in Google; people
> using Microsoft Outlook do not.
He does not need to know that some poor designed newsreaders m
Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 08:52:18 -0700, Carl Banks wrote:
>
> > it's more important
> > to respect community standards than to stick to some silly preference
> > you have.
>
> What happens when the community standard is a silly preference? I object
> to t
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 08:52:18 -0700, Carl Banks wrote:
> it's more important
> to respect community standards than to stick to some silly preference
> you have.
What happens when the community standard is a silly preference? I object
to the suggestion that "community standards" (that is, a standar
Carl Banks wrote:
> Having said that, this decorator will not affect calling overhead at
> all. The decorator is applied when the module is loaded, not when the
> decorated function is called.
to be precise, the decorator is applied when the "def" statement is exe-
cuted (that is, when the decor
First, thanks for the tip of 'tabs'. I keep forgetting
Outlook has some interesting rules about displaying text.
Thanks for the comment about happening at load time. That
resolved the problem (in my thinking)! I don't believe I
have an issue at all...
Peace,
CG.
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 08:52:18 -070
Chance Ginger wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 09:51:18 +0200, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>
> > Chance Ginger" wrote:
> >
> >> If I define a decorator like:
> >>
> >> def t(x) :
> >> def I(x) : return x
> >> return I
> >
> > ... you get a syntax error.
> >
>
> It isn't a syntax error...I tried it before I p
Chance Ginger wrote:
> It isn't a syntax error...I tried it before I posted. In fact
> def t(x) :
> def I(x) : return x
> return I
>
> is correct.
tabs don't make it through all channels. don't use tabs for
indentation when you post to newsgroups or mailing lists.
and @(Y) is not valid Python s
Chance Ginger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 09:51:18 +0200, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>
>> Chance Ginger" wrote:
>>
>>> If I define a decorator like:
>>>
>>> def t(x) :
>>> def I(x) : return x
>>> return I
>>
>> ... you get a syntax error.
>>
>
> It isn't a syntax error...I tried
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 09:51:18 +0200, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Chance Ginger" wrote:
>
>> If I define a decorator like:
>>
>> def t(x) :
>> def I(x) : return x
>> return I
>
> ... you get a syntax error.
>
It isn't a syntax error...I tried it before I posted. In fact
def t(x) :
def I(x) :
Chance Ginger" wrote:
> If I define a decorator like:
>
> def t(x) :
> def I(x) : return x
> return I
... you get a syntax error.
> and use it like:
>
> @t(X)
> def foo(a) :
> # definition of foo...
> pass
that's also a syntax error.
> or maybe this:
>
> @t(X)
> @(Y)
> def bar(a) :
> # The def
23 matches
Mail list logo
