En Fri, 23 May 2008 16:25:19 -0300, Thomas Karolski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> Turns out the first msg I sent did not reach the list, so I'll just post
> what I've achieved by now:
[snip a couple of long metaclasses]
> Now the reason why I'm using decorators, is because I want to be ably t
Turns out the first msg I sent did not reach the list, so I'll just post
what I've achieved by now:
--
class DecoratorDummy(object): pass
class InheritedDecoratorType(type):
def __new__(cls, name, bases, dct):
# return if its a clas
On May 23, 11:42 am, Thomas Karolski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > You will note that Decorator does not define __init__. In fact,
> > object.__init__ will be called, which does nothing. If you think that
> > all classes with DecoratorType as their metaclass will be a direct
> > subclass of Dec
Thanks for pointing out all those mistakes. I think I'm already starting
to grasp all of the python magic going on in there.
Parenthetical: I don't normally recommend this style, since it
obscures the fact that you're using a custom metaclass to the user.
That is something the user probably wou
On May 22, 10:28 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to create a Decorator metaclass, which automatically
> turns a class which inherits from the "Decorator" type into a
> decorator.
> A decorator in this case, is simply a class which has all of its
> decorator implementation inside a
Le Friday 23 May 2008 04:28:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED], vous avez
écrit :
> Hi,
> I would like to create a Decorator metaclass, which automatically
> turns a class which inherits from the "Decorator" type into a
> decorator.
> A decorator in this case, is simply a class which has all of its
> decorator
