On Mar 21, 8:59 pm, Mike Patterson wrote:
> In my Python class the other day, the professor was going over
> decorators and he briefly mentioned that there had been this huge
> debate about the syntax and using the @ sign to signify decorators.
>
> I read about the alternative forms proposed here
And I'm willing to bet that there are plenty of
scripts out there that use "dec" as a name for Decimal objects.
You won. I owe you a beer ;)
Laurent
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Benjamin Kaplan
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Mike Patterson
> wrote:
>> In my Python class the other day, the professor was going over
>> decorators and he briefly mentioned that there had been this huge
>> debate about the syntax and using the @ sign
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Mike Patterson
wrote:
> In my Python class the other day, the professor was going over
> decorators and he briefly mentioned that there had been this huge
> debate about the syntax and using the @ sign to signify decorators.
>
> I read about the alternative forms p
Peter Otten wrote:
>> something like this didn't work for me:
> But this will, I suppose:
>
> @property
> def ancestors(self):
> if self.parent:
> return self.parent.ancestors + [self.parent]
> return []
>
> A non-recursive variant:
>
> @property
> def ancestors(self):
> r
Jeffrey Froman wrote:
> it is the originating node (the node trying to find its ancestors). So
> something like this didn't work for me:
>
> @property
> def ancestors(self):
> if self.parent is None:
> return [self.name]
> return [self.name] + self.parent.ancestors
But this will,
Jeremy Bowers wrote:
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 16:52:52 -0500, Jeremy Bowers wrote:
Oops, sorry, some "send later" messages I thought were gone got sent.
Sorry. Didn't mean to revive dead threads.
At least it happened on April Fool's. Or should I say:
@aprilfools
def happened:
at least
--
http://mail
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 16:52:52 -0500, Jeremy Bowers wrote:
Oops, sorry, some "send later" messages I thought were gone got sent.
Sorry. Didn't mean to revive dead threads.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 16:49:53 +1000, Anthony Baxter wrote:
> The
> people who hate pie-decorators post a _lot_ - most people seem to either
> not care, or else post once or twice and then disappear.
I just posted on another mailing list about how posting the same message,
over and over, is fundamen
