On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Jason Friedman wrote:
>
>> I wrote this decorator: https://gist.github.com/yasar11732/7163528
>>
> I ran it with Python 2 and thought it was neat.
> Most of my work is Python 3.
> I ran 2to3-3.3 against it and I am getting this error:
>
> $ ./simple.py
> Traceback (
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> As print is now a function, you're going to need to construct a
> function call element instead of a special 'print' node. I don't know
> how to do that as I'm not an AST expert, but hopefully you can work it
> out from there?
>
> If you nee
> I wrote this decorator: https://gist.github.com/yasar11732/7163528
>
> I ran it with Python 2 and thought it was neat.
Most of my work is Python 3.
I ran 2to3-3.3 against it and I am getting this error:
$ ./simple.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./simple.py", line 3, in
@debug
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Schneider wrote:
> 2. In the case of an assignment (but holds for the return statement too).
> think about the following code:
>
> a = 0
> @debugging
> def foo():
> a = a + 1
>
> def bar():
> #assign something else to a
>
> Imagine foo() and bar() being c
On 10/26/2013 01:55 AM, Yaşar Arabacı wrote:
Hi people,
I wrote this decorator: https://gist.github.com/yasar11732/7163528
When this code executes:
@debugging
def myfunc(a, b, c, d = 48):
a = 129
return a + b
print myfunc(12,15,17)
This is printed:
fun
On 10/25/2013 7:55 PM, Yaşar Arabacı wrote:
Hi people,
I wrote this decorator: https://gist.github.com/yasar11732/7163528
wow, this looks really powerful. I would like to add the ability to
associate a tag or set of tags with the decorator so that the debug
output only happens when there is
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Yaşar Arabacı wrote:
> I think I can be used instead of inserting and deleting print
> statements when trying to see what is
> passed to a function and what is assingned to what etc. I think it can
> be helpful during debugging.
>
> It works by rewriting ast of th
