Thank you for your explanations.
On Jul 3, 6:27 pm, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Nagu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I made a small recommendation engine for our company using python,
> > django, and mySQL. My supervisor and the senior management are
> > worried about the copyright and
Nagu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I made a small recommendation engine for our company using python,
> django, and mySQL. My supervisor and the senior management are
> worried about the copyright and licensing issues.
It's good that they're raising these concerns and making sure.
> They want to
On Jul 3, 8:33 pm, Nagu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> How do I go about addressing the copyright and licensing issues? (I do
> not know if licensing is the right word here).
>
> Please advice.
>
> Thank you,
> Nagu
I suggest you take the advice of random idiots on a python mailing
list.
--
ht
Hi Folks,
I'm attempting to write a comprehensive manual explaining how to write
Python scripts for the Poser 7 application. All the example scripts,
explanatory paragraphs and screen shots will naturally be all my own
work. My difficulty is in knowing how I may present the large amount
of tabulat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is the PSF that much different from any other open source license?
Only in not having a copyleft and therefore being potentially usable by
companies wishing to develop closed software. Generally such companies
wouldn't even consider using GPL'd software so they don't
Erik Max Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>
>> Depends on the country's laws and the exact agreement.
>
> Work for hire is part of the Berne convention.
>
According to recent (2003) Slovak copyright law, ONLY the individual
authors own the copyright, and they cann
I realize that this thread skirts with being OT, but there are
serious implications for Pythonistas and Open Source software types.
I didn't mean to suggest that T.E. moved to California. I did,
however, misspeak (mis-type?) when I said Edison formed a studio in
California. His was in NJ, ac
David T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Tom Edison moved to California so _he_ could skirt copyright laws of
I'm not aware of any move to California for either the better-known
Thomas Alva Edison, or his lesser-known and less successful son of the
same name. Could you clarify? The movie indu
Mike Meyer wrote:
> Erik Max Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>Mike Meyer wrote:
>>
>>>Further, recent evidence is that this is no longer true in that
>>>country, assuming it ever was.
>>
>>Oh, please. Take the political crap elsewhere.
>
> It's got as much right to be here as the copyrigh
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> That is *not* generally true, although it is true in certain industries,
> such as newspapers.
It is true in many industries, including the software industry. My
point was that the creator of a work and the copyright holder and not
necessarily one and the same. Often,
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> Depends on the country's laws and the exact agreement.
Work for hire is part of the Berne convention.
--
Erik Max Francis && [EMAIL PROTECTED] && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && AIM erikmaxfrancis
Life is painting a picture, n
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:16:43 -0800, Erik Max Francis wrote:
> David T wrote:
>
>> Individuals, and perhaps groups of individuals are the creators of
>> works.
>
> When someone pays you to create a work, then they own the copyright, not
> you. It's called work for hire.
That is *not* general
Erik Max Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mike Meyer wrote:
>> Further, recent evidence is that this is no longer true in that
>> country, assuming it ever was.
> Oh, please. Take the political crap elsewhere.
It's got as much right to be here as the copyright crap. And I'm
trying to keep it
Erik Max Francis a écrit :
> David T wrote:
>
>> Individuals, and perhaps groups of individuals are the creators of
>> works.
>
>
> When someone pays you to create a work, then they own the copyright,
Depends on the country's laws and the exact agreement.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/l
"The Eternal Squire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>Further, recent evidence is that this is no longer true in that
>>country, assuming it ever was.
> Wow, how Machiaviellian.
Just an observation on the state of the US. It's been a long while
since the people running the country did so for the peop
Mike Meyer wrote:
> Further, recent evidence is that this is no longer true in that
> country, assuming it ever was.
Oh, please. Take the political crap elsewhere.
--
Erik Max Francis && [EMAIL PROTECTED] && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && AIM erikmaxfranci
David T wrote:
> Individuals, and perhaps groups of individuals are the creators of
> works.
When someone pays you to create a work, then they own the copyright, not
you. It's called work for hire.
--
Erik Max Francis && [EMAIL PROTECTED] && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
San Jose, CA, USA &&
>As far as I know, only one country ever claimed to have that, so your
>"we" only applies to citizens of that country, and not to everyone who
>may be reading the letter - and the status of the person you quoted
>but did not attribute is unclear.
It applies to not only the US, which explicitly has
"The Eternal Squire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>Copyright is a gift granted by the government, not the natural state of
>>the world. When kings and emperors and presidents give commercial and
>>economic gifts, like monopolies, they rarely are for the benefit of the
>>majority.
> Last I knew, we
>Perhaps there is no way to make a living from writing novels without
>copyright. There is no way to make a living from playing solitaire either
>-- should the government pass a law giving a legal monopoly on playing red
>queen on a black king to my granny, so that everyone playing that move
>has t
20 matches
Mail list logo
