John Machin wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The following program does not work if you uncomment #lis =
> > ["xmms2"] + list(args)
> >
> > Evidently Python is opting for the nullary constructor list() as
> > opposed to the other one which takes a sequence. But no newcomer would know
> >
Georg Brandl wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The following program does not work if you uncomment #lis =
> > ["xmms2"] + list(args)
> >
> > Evidently Python is opting for the nullary constructor list() as
> > opposed to the other one which takes a sequence. But no newcomer would
> > know
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The following program does not work if you uncomment #lis =
> ["xmms2"] + list(args)
>
> Evidently Python is opting for the nullary constructor list() as
> opposed to the other one which takes a sequence. But no newcomer would know
> this.
Are you using "the nullar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The following program does not work if you uncomment #lis =
> ["xmms2"] + list(args)
>
> Evidently Python is opting for the nullary constructor list() as
> opposed to the other one which takes a sequence. But no newcomer would
> know this. And the Python docs dont gi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The following program does not work if you uncomment #lis =
> ["xmms2"] + list(args)
>
> Evidently Python is opting for the nullary constructor list() as
> opposed to the other one which takes a sequence. But no newcomer would
> know this. And the Python docs dont gi
