On Apr 21, 4:16 pm, George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 21, 4:42 pm, Matimus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 21, 12:05 pm, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I've been trying to figure out a way to combine lists similar to how
> > > zip() works. The main
> > > difference
On Apr 21, 4:42 pm, Matimus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 21, 12:05 pm, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I've been trying to figure out a way to combine lists similar to how zip()
> > works. The main
> > difference though is I want to work with different length lists and combine
> > th
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If anyone has time, I was wondering if you could share your thoughts
> on whether this is an efficient way to do something like this, if it's
> horrible and slow, etc.
If your lists are fairly short then your algorithm is probably the best
way to d
On Apr 21, 12:05 pm, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been trying to figure out a way to combine lists similar to how zip()
> works. The main
> difference though is I want to work with different length lists and combine
> them. I came up with
> the example below, which returns a list like I'm
