Hi there,
We are currently looking for someone who has ideally several years coding
experience, and who is familar with
Network coding and the Python language.
The project revolves around emulation and a chat based system, altough the vast
majority of the project is focused
on the chat based
Falcolas writes:
> On Jan 21, 12:10 pm, Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
[...]
>> Or you could override __getattr__
>>
>> --
>> Arnaud
>
> I tried overriding __getattr__ and got an error at runtime (the
> instance did not have xyz key, etc), and the Tag dict is not
> modifiable (granted, I tried Tag.__di
On Jan 21, 1:55 pm, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> Falcolas wrote:
> > I tried overriding __getattr__ and got an error at runtime (the
>
> You can either move __getattr__() into the metaclass or instantiate the
> class. I prefer the latter.
>
> Both approaches in one example:
>
> >>> class
Falcolas wrote:
> I tried overriding __getattr__ and got an error at runtime (the
You can either move __getattr__() into the metaclass or instantiate the
class. I prefer the latter.
Both approaches in one example:
>>> class Tag:
... class __metaclass__(type):
... def __getattr_
On Jan 21, 12:10 pm, Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
> On Jan 21, 6:37 pm, Falcolas wrote:
>
> > On Jan 21, 11:24 am, Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
>
> > It was the easiest way I found to add a lot of static methods to the
> > Tag class without writing each one out. __getattr__ was not working
> > for this ap
On Jan 21, 6:37 pm, Falcolas wrote:
> On Jan 21, 11:24 am, Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Falcolas writes:
> > > I'm running into an issue with closures in metaclasses - that is, if I
> > > create a function with a closure in a metaclass, the closure appears
> > > to be lost when I access
On Jan 21, 11:24 am, Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
> Falcolas writes:
> > I'm running into an issue with closures in metaclasses - that is, if I
> > create a function with a closure in a metaclass, the closure appears
> > to be lost when I access the final class. I end up getting the text
> > 'param' i
Falcolas writes:
> I'm running into an issue with closures in metaclasses - that is, if I
> create a function with a closure in a metaclass, the closure appears
> to be lost when I access the final class. I end up getting the text
> 'param' instead of the actual tags I am expecting:
>
> ALL_TAGS
