On 09/06/2015 13:15, Skip Montanaro wrote:
One thing which seems obvious now is that since format() delegates to
the individual types for formatting, much of the documentation of this
stuff must now be delegated to the individual types. However, I can't
find anything about the formatting syntax
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:29 AM, wrote:
> Where have you looked? Have you read
> https://docs.python.org/3/library/string.html#formatspec ?
Yes, but I missed the None section. I looked closely at 'g', but
didn't see anything like "this is the default". I will admit I was a
bit frustrated to see t
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015, at 08:15, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> Skip> Why don't floats support "{:.Ns}"? (I know I can use "{!s}".)
>
> random832> Why would they? The old style didn't support %.Ns either.
>
> Well, the old style does, though it appears the N is ignored:
>
> >>> "%5s" % -0.00666762259822
Skip> Why don't floats support "{:.Ns}"? (I know I can use "{!s}".)
random832> Why would they? The old style didn't support %.Ns either.
Well, the old style does, though it appears the N is ignored:
>>> "%5s" % -0.00666762259822
'-0.00666762259822'
It doesn't raise an exception though.
(This i
On 08/06/2015 21:05, Steven K Knight wrote:
June 8 2015 3:11 PM, "Skip Montanaro" mailto:%22Skip%20Montanaro%22%20>> wrote:
I have so far ignored the new string formatting (you know, the stuff
with all the braces, dots and brackets that make Python strings look
like Perl code ). I
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015, at 16:32, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> This is counterintuitive:
>
> >>> "{:.3}".format(-0.00666762259822)
> '-0.00667'
> >>> "{:.3f}".format(-0.00666762259822)
> '-0.007'
> >>> "%.3f" % -0.00666762259822
> '-0.007'
> >>> "{:.3s}".format(-0.00666762259822)
> ValueError Unknown form
On 08.06.15 23:32, Skip Montanaro wrote:
This is counterintuitive:
>>> "{:.3}".format(-0.00666762259822)
'-0.00667'
>>> "{:.3f}".format(-0.00666762259822)
'-0.007'
>>> "%.3f" % -0.00666762259822
'-0.007'
>>> "{:.3s}".format(-0.00666762259822)
ValueError Unknown format code 's' for object of
It just means significant digits in the general format, which alternates
between 10-exponent notation and plain decimal notation.
https://docs.python.org/3.4/library/string.html#format-specification-mini-language
>>> '{:.3}'.format(0.356785)
'3.57e-05'
>>> '{:.3}'.format(0.0035678
This is counterintuitive:
>>> "{:.3}".format(-0.00666762259822)
'-0.00667'
>>> "{:.3f}".format(-0.00666762259822)
'-0.007'
>>> "%.3f" % -0.00666762259822
'-0.007'
>>> "{:.3s}".format(-0.00666762259822)
ValueError Unknown format code 's' for object of type 'float'
Why does the first form display f
June 8 2015 3:11 PM, "Skip Montanaro" wrote:
I have so far ignored the new string formatting (you know, the stuff
with all the braces, dots and brackets that make Python strings look like Perl
code ). I am still only using Python 2.7, but have recently started forcing
myself to use the
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Steven K Knight wrote:
> I think http://pyformat.info/ is what you're looking for.
Perfect, thanks!
S
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Riccardo T. ha scritto:
> I wrote a little cheat sheet for this wonderful language, but because of
> my still little experience with it, I would like to have a feedback
> Could you have a look at it and tell me what do you think about, please?
>
> http://greyfox.imente.org/index.php?id=73
>
> --
En Sat, 29 Dec 2007 06:58:27 -0200, ZeD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribi�:
> Michele Simionato wrote:
>
>> Nowadays file is no more an alias for open.
>
> curious... maybe it's me, but I can't find a "What's New in Python" where
> this is said...
See Misc/NEWS:
- Patch #1479181: split open() and file(
ZeD ha scritto:
> Michele Simionato wrote:
>
>> Python 2.4.4 (#2, Oct 4 2007, 22:02:31)
> file is open
>> True
>>
>> Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Oct 5 2007, 13:36:32)
> file is open
>> False
>>
>> Nowadays file is no more an alias for open.
>
> curious... maybe it's me, but I can't find a
Scott David Daniels ha scritto:
> Riccardo T. wrote:
>> Maybe I'll add __builtin__ and os in place of the type hierarchy, but
>> I'm not sure about that. However, not in the next release. What do you
>> think about?
>
> How about:
> top line w/ __builtin__, os, os.path (and no contents -- inspire
Michele Simionato wrote:
> Python 2.4.4 (#2, Oct 4 2007, 22:02:31)
file is open
> True
>
> Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Oct 5 2007, 13:36:32)
file is open
> False
>
> Nowadays file is no more an alias for open.
curious... maybe it's me, but I can't find a "What's New in Python" where
t
Alaric ha scritto:
> Nicely done! I would suggest you put your website address on it and a revision
> number so that as it gains use on te web, people can find the "latest"
> version.
That's a good idea, thank you :)
--
GreyFox
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Riccardo T. wrote:
>
>
> I wrote a little cheat sheet for this wonderful language, but because of
> my still little experience with it, I would like to have a feedback
> Could you have a look at it and tell me what do you think about, please?
>
> http://greyfox.imente.org/index.php?id=73
>
> --
> G
Riccardo T. wrote:
> Scott David Daniels ha scritto:
>> Riccardo T. wrote:
>>> Scott David Daniels ha scritto:
[in the .png]
> ...
> Callable types
>...
>User-definet methods
I personally prefer "User-defined methods"
>>> That's a typo, thank you.
>> Hope I didn't
Scott David Daniels ha scritto:
> Riccardo T. wrote:
>> Scott David Daniels ha scritto:
>>> [in the .png]
...
Callable types
...
User-definet methods
>>> I personally prefer "User-defined methods"
>>
>> That's a typo, thank you.
>
> Hope I didn't offend (I was simply tryi
Riccardo T. wrote:
> Scott David Daniels ha scritto:
>> [in the .png]
>>> ...
>>> Callable types
>>>...
>>>User-definet methods
>> I personally prefer "User-defined methods"
>
> That's a typo, thank you.
Hope I didn't offend (I was simply trying to be cute).
Some from a bit further along.
c james ha scritto:
> On the svg version, as viewed on firefox, the sections "Simple
> statements", "Definations" and "Comments"; there appears to be a problem
> with text wrapping.
I see, it has already been signaled by mail. I'm not sure about how to
fix that, I'll have to ask someone who knows
Riccardo T. wrote:
> I wrote a little cheat sheet for this wonderful language, but because of
> my still little experience with it, I would like to have a feedback
> Could you have a look at it and tell me what do you think about, please?
>
> http://greyfox.imente.org/index.php?id=73
>
> --
> Gre
On Dec 28, 12:40 pm, "Riccardo T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "file" objects are generally supposed to be built with the
> > open function, not instantiated as shown.
>
> Since open() is just an alias for file(), changing the name should be
> enough, right?
It depends on the Python version:
P
Scott David Daniels ha scritto:
> [in the .png]
>> ...
>> Callable types
>>...
>>User-definet methods
>
> I personally prefer "User-defined methods"
That's a typo, thank you.
>>...
>>Class instances
> I'd try:
> Class instances with a __call__ method.
Yes, it's more clear
Looks good thanks!
On Dec 27, 2007 11:06 PM, Scott David Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Riccardo T. wrote:
> > I wrote a little cheat sheet for this wonderful language, but because of
> > my still little experience with it, I would like to have a feedback
> > Could you have a look at it and
Riccardo T. wrote:
> I wrote a little cheat sheet for this wonderful language, but because of
> my still little experience with it, I would like to have a feedback
> Could you have a look at it and tell me what do you think about, please?
>
> http://greyfox.imente.org/index.php?id=73
>
> --
> Gre
Carl Banks ha scritto:
> On Dec 27, 12:38 pm, "Riccardo T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I wrote a little cheat sheet for this wonderful language, but because of
>> my still little experience with it, I would like to have a feedback
>> Could you have a look at it and tell me what do you think abou
On Dec 27, 12:38 pm, "Riccardo T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote a little cheat sheet for this wonderful language, but because of
> my still little experience with it, I would like to have a feedback
> Could you have a look at it and tell me what do you think about, please?
>
> http://greyfo
Markus Gritsch ha scritto:
> On Dec 27, 11:38 am, "Riccardo T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I wrote a little cheat sheet for this wonderful language, but because of
>> my still little experience with it, I would like to have a feedback
>> Could you have a look at it and tell me what do you think
On Dec 27, 11:38 am, "Riccardo T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote a little cheat sheet for this wonderful language, but because of
> my still little experience with it, I would like to have a feedback
> Could you have a look at it and tell me what do you think about, please?
>
> http://greyfo
On Dec 27, 1:44 pm, "Riccardo T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
>
> > Looks cool, but you might find these interesting too:
>
> >http://www.limsi.fr/Individu/pointal/python/pqrc/
> >http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2006-June/386662.html
>
> > Mike
>
> Thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
> Looks cool, but you might find these interesting too:
>
> http://www.limsi.fr/Individu/pointal/python/pqrc/
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2006-June/386662.html
>
> Mike
Thanks :)
I'll read them to improve my python knowledge, but I prefere to have
On Dec 27, 11:38 am, "Riccardo T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote a little cheat sheet for this wonderful language, but because of
> my still little experience with it, I would like to have a feedback
> Could you have a look at it and tell me what do you think about, please?
>
> http://greyfo
34 matches
Mail list logo
