Re: Change in behaviour Python 3.7 > 3.8

2020-02-07 Thread Ethan Furman
On 02/07/2020 09:13 AM, bill.orin...@gmail.com wrote: Does anyone know of a service where I can send my STL files and have them converted to .x3g file, so I can simply upload the file to my SD card and run the parts in my Printer (Creator Pro Flashforge). I have had no success in doing this an

RE: Change in behaviour Python 3.7 > 3.8

2020-02-07 Thread bill.orinski
... Thanks, Bill O. -Original Message- From: Python-list On Behalf Of Souvik Dutta Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2020 8:48 AM To: Frank Millman Cc: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Change in behaviour Python 3.7 > 3.8 You might find this helpful. https://docs.python.org/3/refere

Re: Change in behaviour Python 3.7 > 3.8

2020-02-07 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
07.02.20 07:27, Frank Millman пише: @Serhiy I import the common object *from* Module A. Sorry, I incorrectly described the change made in issue1. Even if you import it from module A, you can see that it was set to None at the time of executing __del__. But you could see this even before

Re: Change in behaviour Python 3.7 > 3.8

2020-02-07 Thread Frank Millman
On 2020-02-07 1:06 PM, Barry Scott wrote: On 7 Feb 2020, at 05:27, Frank Millman wrote: @Barry I agree that __del__() is rarely useful, but I have not come up with an alternative to achieve what I want to do. My app is a long-running server, and creates many objects on-the-fly depending on

Re: Change in behaviour Python 3.7 > 3.8

2020-02-07 Thread Barry Scott
> On 7 Feb 2020, at 05:27, Frank Millman wrote: > > @Barry > I agree that __del__() is rarely useful, but I have not come up with an > alternative to achieve what I want to do. My app is a long-running server, > and creates many objects on-the-fly depending on user input. They should be > s

Re: Change in behaviour Python 3.7 > 3.8

2020-02-06 Thread Frank Millman
On 2020-02-06 2:58 PM, Frank Millman wrote: [...] I have a module (A) containing common objects shared by other modules. I have a module (B) which imports one of these common objects - a set(). [...] This has worked for years, but now when the __del__ method is called, the common object,

Re: Change in behaviour Python 3.7 > 3.8

2020-02-06 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
06.02.20 14:58, Frank Millman пише: I have noticed a change in behaviour in Python 3.8 compared with previous versions of Python going back to at least 2.7. I am pretty sure that it is not a problem, and is caused by my relying on a certain sequence of events at shutdown, which of course is not

Re: Change in behaviour Python 3.7 > 3.8

2020-02-06 Thread Souvik Dutta
You might find this helpful. https://docs.python.org/3/reference/datamodel.html Thank you 😊😙 On Thu, Feb 6, 2020, 6:29 PM Frank Millman wrote: > Hi all > > I have noticed a change in behaviour in Python 3.8 compared with > previous versions of Python going back to at least 2.7. I am pretty sur

Re: Change in behaviour Python 3.7 > 3.8

2020-02-06 Thread Barry
> On 6 Feb 2020, at 13:01, Frank Millman wrote: > > Hi all > > I have noticed a change in behaviour in Python 3.8 compared with previous > versions of Python going back to at least 2.7. I am pretty sure that it is > not a problem, and is caused by my relying on a certain sequence of events