Emanuele D'Arrigo a écrit :
Hi everybody,
I just had a bit of a shiver for something I'm doing often in my code
but that might be based on a wrong assumption on my part.
Do not assume. Either check or use another solution. My 2 cents...
Take the
following code:
pattern = "aPattern"
compile
alex23 wrote:
> On Mar 20, 1:42 am, "Emanuele D'Arrigo" wrote:
> > I just had a bit of a shiver for something I'm doing often in my code
> > but that might be based on a wrong assumption on my part. Take the
> > following code:
> >
> > pattern = "aPattern"
> >
> > compiledPatterns = [ ]
> > compi
On Mar 20, 1:42 am, "Emanuele D'Arrigo" wrote:
> I just had a bit of a shiver for something I'm doing often in my code
> but that might be based on a wrong assumption on my part. Take the
> following code:
>
> pattern = "aPattern"
>
> compiledPatterns = [ ]
> compiledPatterns.append(re.compile(pat
"Emanuele D'Arrigo" wrote:
> Thank you everybody for the informative replies.
>
> I'll have to comb my code for all the instances of "item in sequence"
> statement because I suspect some of them are as unsafe as my first
> example. Oh well. One more lesson learned.
You may have far fewer unsafe
Thank you everybody for the informative replies.
I'll have to comb my code for all the instances of "item in sequence"
statement because I suspect some of them are as unsafe as my first
example. Oh well. One more lesson learned.
Thank you again.
Manu
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/py
Emanuele D'Arrigo wrote:
Hi everybody,
I just had a bit of a shiver for something I'm doing often in my code
but that might be based on a wrong assumption on my part. Take the
following code:
pattern = "aPattern"
compiledPatterns = [ ]
compiledPatterns.append(re.compile(pattern))
if(re.compil
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 08:42 -0700, Emanuele D'Arrigo wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I just had a bit of a shiver for something I'm doing often in my code
> but that might be based on a wrong assumption on my part. Take the
> following code:
>
> pattern = "aPattern"
>
> compiledPatterns = [ ]
> compi
Emanuele D'Arrigo wrote:
[snip]
If the answer is no, am I right to state the in the case portrayed
above the only way to be safe is to use the following code instead?
for item in compiledPatterns:
if(item.pattern == pattern):
print("The compiled pattern is stored.")
break
Co
Emanuele D'Arrigo wrote:
Hi everybody,
I just had a bit of a shiver for something I'm doing often in my code
but that might be based on a wrong assumption on my part. Take the
following code:
pattern = "aPattern"
compiledPatterns = [ ]
compiledPatterns.append(re.compile(pattern))
if(re.compil
