On 8 Mag, 03:33, Carl Banks wrote:
> On May 7, 6:12 pm, "Giampaolo Rodola'" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi,
> > I'm searching for a smooth way to call a certain function when a
> > thread has finished its job.
> > I guess I can keep calling isAlive() in a loop and call my function
> > when it returns Fa
On May 7, 6:12 pm, "Giampaolo Rodola'" wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm searching for a smooth way to call a certain function when a
> thread has finished its job.
> I guess I can keep calling isAlive() in a loop and call my function
> when it returns False but it's not very elegant.
> Actually I'm a bit surpri
