Re: CDATA and lxml

2008-04-11 Thread Silfheed
On Apr 11, 3:49 pm, Silfheed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 11, 10:33 am, Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi again, > > > Stefan Behnel wrote: > > > Silfheed wrote: > > >> So first off I know that CDATA is generally hated and just shouldn't > > >> be done, but I'm simply req

Re: CDATA and lxml

2008-04-11 Thread Silfheed
On Apr 11, 10:33 am, Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi again, > > Stefan Behnel wrote: > > Silfheed wrote: > >> So first off I know that CDATA is generally hated and just shouldn't > >> be done, but I'm simply required to parse it and spit it back out. > >> Parsing is pretty easy with l

Re: CDATA and lxml

2008-04-11 Thread Stefan Behnel
Silfheed wrote: > So first off I know that CDATA is generally hated and just shouldn't > be done, but I'm simply required to parse it and spit it back out. > Parsing is pretty easy with lxml, but it's the spitting back out > that's giving me issues. The fact that lxml strips all the CDATA > stuff