On 9/7/2010 9:56 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
In article<4c87013f$0$1625$742ec...@news.sonic.net>,
John Nagle wrote:
On 9/7/2010 5:43 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 9/7/2010 3:02 PM, John Nagle wrote:
There's a bug in Python 2.6's "urllib.urlencode". If you pass
in a Unicode character outside the ASCII
In article <4c87013f$0$1625$742ec...@news.sonic.net>,
John Nagle wrote:
> On 9/7/2010 5:43 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> > On 9/7/2010 3:02 PM, John Nagle wrote:
> >> There's a bug in Python 2.6's "urllib.urlencode". If you pass
> >> in a Unicode character outside the ASCII range, instead of it
> >> b
On 9/7/2010 5:43 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 9/7/2010 3:02 PM, John Nagle wrote:
There's a bug in Python 2.6's "urllib.urlencode". If you pass
in a Unicode character outside the ASCII range, instead of it
being encoded properly, an exception is raised.
File "C:\python26\lib\urllib.py", line 1267,
On 9/7/2010 3:02 PM, John Nagle wrote:
There's a bug in Python 2.6's "urllib.urlencode". If you pass
in a Unicode character outside the ASCII range, instead of it
being encoded properly, an exception is raised.
File "C:\python26\lib\urllib.py", line 1267, in urlencode
v = quote_plus(str(v))
U
In article <4c868c2d$0$1581$742ec...@news.sonic.net>,
John Nagle wrote:
> Is it worth reporting 2.x bugs any more? Or are we in the
> version suckage period, where version N is abandonware and
> version N+1 isn't deployable yet.
Yes!! 2.7 is being actively maintained for bug fixes. (2.6 o
