On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Cai Gengyang wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 1:01:50 PM UTC+8, Cameron Simpson
> wrote:
> > On 26Sep2017 20:55, Cai Gengyang wrote:
> > >On Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 6:45:00 AM UTC+8, Cameron Simpson
> wrote:
> > >> On 26Sep2017 14:43, Cai Gen
On Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 1:01:50 PM UTC+8, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 26Sep2017 20:55, Cai Gengyang wrote:
> >On Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 6:45:00 AM UTC+8, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> >> On 26Sep2017 14:43, Cai Gengyang wrote:
> >> >C) Set bool_three equal to the result of
> >> >
On 26Sep2017 20:55, Cai Gengyang wrote:
On Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 6:45:00 AM UTC+8, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 26Sep2017 14:43, Cai Gengyang wrote:
>C) Set bool_three equal to the result of
>19 % 4 != 300 / 10 / 10 and False
>
19 % 4 = 3 which is equal to 300 / 10 / 10 = 3, hence the
Cai Gengyang wrote:
So does that mean that the way 'and' works in Python is that both terms must
be True (1) for the entire expression to be True ? Why is it defined that
way, weird ?
It's not weird, it's the normal meaning of "and" in English.
Do I have purple hair? No.
Do I have three nostri
On Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 6:45:00 AM UTC+8, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 26Sep2017 14:43, Cai Gengyang wrote:
> >Help check if my logic is correct in all 5 expressions
>
> Why not just run some code interactively? Unless this is entirely a thought
> exercise to verify that you have a so
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 08:23 am, Cai Gengyang wrote:
>
> I'm trying to understand the logic behind AND. I looked up Python logic tables
>
> False and False gives False
> False and True gives False
> True and False gives False
> True and True gives True.
>
> So does that mean that the way 'and' wor
On 27/09/17 00:23, Cai Gengyang wrote:
> I'm trying to understand the logic behind AND. I looked up Python logic tables
>
> False and False gives False
> False and True gives False
> True and False gives False
> True and True gives True.
>
> So does that mean that the way 'and' works in Python is t
>
> On Sep 26, 2017, at 3:23 PM, Cai Gengyang wrote:
>
>
> I'm trying to understand the logic behind AND. I looked up Python logic tables
>
> False and False gives False
> False and True gives False
> True and False gives False
> True and True gives True.
>
> So does that mean that the way 'a
On 09/27/2017 12:23 AM, Cai Gengyang wrote:
>
> I'm trying to understand the logic behind AND. I looked up Python logic tables
>
> False and False gives False
> False and True gives False
> True and False gives False
> True and True gives True.
>
> So does that mean that the way 'and' works in P
On 26Sep2017 15:23, Cai Gengyang wrote:
I'm trying to understand the logic behind AND. I looked up Python logic tables
False and False gives False
False and True gives False
True and False gives False
True and True gives True.
So does that mean that the way 'and' works in Python is that both
On 26Sep2017 14:43, Cai Gengyang wrote:
Help check if my logic is correct in all 5 expressions
Why not just run some code interactively? Unless this is entirely a thought
exercise to verify that you have a solid mental understanding of Python
semantics, all your reasoning is easy to test.
On 09/26/2017 03:23 PM, Cai Gengyang wrote:
I'm trying to understand the logic behind AND. I looked up Python logic tables
False and False gives False
False and True gives False
True and False gives False
True and True gives True.
So does that mean that the way 'and' works in Python is that bo
I'm trying to understand the logic behind AND. I looked up Python logic tables
False and False gives False
False and True gives False
True and False gives False
True and True gives True.
So does that mean that the way 'and' works in Python is that both terms must be
True (1) for the entire expr
On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 2:54:32 PM UTC-7, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Cai Gengyang wrote:
> > Help check if my logic is correct in all 5 expressions
> >
> >
> > A) Set bool_one equal to the result of
> > False and False
> >
> > Entire Expression : False and F
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Cai Gengyang wrote:
> Help check if my logic is correct in all 5 expressions
>
>
> A) Set bool_one equal to the result of
> False and False
>
> Entire Expression : False and False gives True because both are False
This is not correct, and comes from a confusion in
15 matches
Mail list logo
