Philip Smith wrote:
I wonder if anyone has any thoughts not on where Python should go but where
it should stop?
My feelings on this is, it's a problem of organization and
documentation. Do both of these well, and things will be manageable.
I would like to see a bit cleaner file organization fra
Philip Smith wrote:
>
> Conventions on type conversion are just one example. Without using
> strict coding conventions the richness of the language could, and
> often did, result in ambiguity. In my experience too C++ has
> defeated its own object (eg portability) - I've given up in many
> cases
Philip,
more often than not, all needed was included in Python years ago.
Especially:
> I wonder if anyone has any thoughts not on where Python should go but
> where it should stop?
The answer is included within the standard library. On any Python command
prompt type:
>>>import this
The Zen
