On 06/06/18 02:48, Ben Finney wrote:
> "Peter J. Holzer" writes:
>> (I remember that I have seen some messages in the past where an
>> attachment was obviously missing. Maybe specific content types are
>> stripped, but not attachments in general)
>
> Yes. There may be exceptions, but “don't expec
"Peter J. Holzer" writes:
> Then the statement
>
> | (For good reasons, attachments are dropped when messages are
> | distributed on the forum.)
>
> was demonstrable false (at least overly general) as the attachment in
> Jach's message wasn't dropped.
Try this more precise statement, then:
Many
On 2018-06-05 09:33:03 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> "Peter J. Holzer" writes:
> > So we have determined that "the forum" is not the mailing list and not
> > the newsgroup (Jach's message appeared on both with the attachment).
>
> By “the forum” I don't mean any specific server to the exclusion of
>
On 2018-06-05, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>
>>> However, I did see that particular particular attachment, test.py in
>>> Jach's original post, and I'm reading c.l.py via gmane.
>>
>> comp.lang.python or gmane.comp.python.general? (I see the latter
>> but not the
Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>> However, I did see that particular particular attachment, test.py in
>> Jach's original post, and I'm reading c.l.py via gmane.
>
> comp.lang.python or gmane.comp.python.general? (I see the latter but not
> the former on gmane, but I'm accessing it anonymously which migh
On 6/4/18 12:34 PM, Peter Pearson wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 20:20:32 +0200, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> [snip]
>> On 2018-06-03 13:57:26 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>>> (For good reasons, attachments are dropped when messages are distributed
>>> on the forum.)
>> By "the forum" you mean Gmane? (I got
"Peter J. Holzer" writes:
> So we have determined that "the forum" is not the mailing list and not
> the newsgroup (Jach's message appeared on both with the attachment).
By “the forum” I don't mean any specific server to the exclusion of
others. I mean the aggregate forum in which we are having
On 2018-06-04 22:59:52 +0200, Peter Otten wrote:
> Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > On 2018-06-04 16:34:08 +, Peter Pearson wrote:
> >> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 20:20:32 +0200, Peter J. Holzer
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 2018-06-03 13:57:26 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> >> >> (For good reasons, attachments are dro
Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> On 2018-06-04 16:34:08 +, Peter Pearson wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 20:20:32 +0200, Peter J. Holzer
>> wrote:
>> > On 2018-06-03 13:57:26 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>> >> (For good reasons, attachments are dropped when messages are
>> >> distributed on the forum.)
>> >
On 2018-06-04 16:34:08 +, Peter Pearson wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 20:20:32 +0200, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > On 2018-06-03 13:57:26 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> >> (For good reasons, attachments are dropped when messages are distributed
> >> on the forum.)
> >
> > By "the forum" you mean Gmane
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 20:20:32 +0200, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
[snip]
> On 2018-06-03 13:57:26 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>> (For good reasons, attachments are dropped when messages are distributed
>> on the forum.)
>
> By "the forum" you mean Gmane? (I got the attachment over the mailing
> list)
Comp.l
On 2018-06-02 07:59:07 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 7:03 AM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > On 2018-05-31 14:42:39 -0700, Paul wrote:
> >> I have heard that attachments to messages are not allowed on this list,
> >> which makes sense. However I notice that messages from Peter
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 7:03 AM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> On 2018-05-31 14:42:39 -0700, Paul wrote:
>> I have heard that attachments to messages are not allowed on this list,
>> which makes sense. However I notice that messages from Peter do have an
>> attachment, i.e., a signature.asc file.
>
> No
On 2018-05-31 14:42:39 -0700, Paul wrote:
> I have heard that attachments to messages are not allowed on this list,
> which makes sense. However I notice that messages from Peter do have an
> attachment, i.e., a signature.asc file.
No this is isn't an attachment. It's a signature. Your MUA probabl
I gave it a different subject line.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:45 AM, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer <
arj.pyt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> as this sig file is a common occurance, attaching the topic to the data
> blocks thread is not really necessary
>
> Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
> https://github.com/Abdur-rah
as this sig file is a common occurance, attaching the topic to the data
blocks thread is not really necessary
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018, 01:49 Paul, wrote:
> I have heard that attachments to messages are not allowed on this list,
> which makes
16 matches
Mail list logo
