On Sep 3, 12:35 am, Chris Torek wrote:
> In article <18fe4afd-569b-4580-a629-50f6c7482...@c29g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
> Travis Parks wrote:
>
> >[Someone] commented that the itertools algorithms will perform
> >faster than the hand-written ones. Are these algorithms optimized
> >internally?
>
In article <18fe4afd-569b-4580-a629-50f6c7482...@c29g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
Travis Parks wrote:
>[Someone] commented that the itertools algorithms will perform
>faster than the hand-written ones. Are these algorithms optimized
>internally?
They are written in C, so avoid a lot of CPython inte
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Travis Parks wrote:
> You commented that the itertools algorithms will perform faster than
> the hand-written ones. Are these algorithms optimized internally?
For one thing, they are written in C.
Cheers,
Chris
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-l
On Sep 2, 6:49 pm, Travis Parks wrote:
> On Sep 2, 4:09 pm, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Travis Parks
> > wrote:
> > > Hello:
>
> > > I am working on an algorithms library. It provides LINQ like
> > > functionality to Python iterators. Eventually, I plan on ha
On Sep 2, 4:09 pm, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Travis Parks wrote:
> > Hello:
>
> > I am working on an algorithms library. It provides LINQ like
> > functionality to Python iterators. Eventually, I plan on having
> > feaures that work against sequences and mappings.
>
> >
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Travis Parks wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I am working on an algorithms library. It provides LINQ like
> functionality to Python iterators. Eventually, I plan on having
> feaures that work against sequences and mappings.
>
> I have the code up at http://code.google.com/p/py
