On Sep 14, 9:54 am, Chris Colbert wrote:
> why not just pawn your processing loop off onto a child thread and
> give yourself a hook (function) that you can call that return whatver
> info you what. Run the script in ipython, problem solved.
>
thank you Chris, I have just implemented this in a mo
why not just pawn your processing loop off onto a child thread and
give yourself a hook (function) that you can call that return whatver
info you what. Run the script in ipython, problem solved.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:57 AM, jacopo wrote:
>
>> You might consider running a BaseHTTPServer in
> You might consider running a BaseHTTPServer in a separate thread
> which has references to your objects of interest and exporting the
> data through a web interface. Using a RESTful approach for mapping
> URLs to objects within your system, a basic export of the data can
> be as simple as pri
In article <228b-379d-4fe4-956b-cf803541a...@37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
jacopo wrote:
>I have a system comprising many objects cooperating with each others.
>(For the time being, everything is running on the same machine, in the
>same process but things might change in the future). The sy
jacopo:
>
>> What exactly do you want to know? The names of existing attributes or
>> their content? The latter is probably obvious to you and the former is
>> easy, too. See hasattr, getattr and isinstance.
>
> I want to know the value of the attributes.
> What you suggest works when the program
>
> What exactly do you want to know? The names of existing attributes or
> their content? The latter is probably obvious to you and the former is
> easy, too. See hasattr, getattr and isinstance.
I want to know the value of the attributes.
What you suggest works when the program stops, objects a
jacopo:
>
> I would like to find a way to inspect the objects at run time. In
> other words I would like to check certain attributes in order to
> understand in which status the object is.
What exactly do you want to know? The names of existing attributes or
their content? The latter is probably
