king kikapu wrote:
> On Apr 12, 1:02 am, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> All parts of the software have to be licensed compatibly with the GPL. The
>> FSF
>> has a fairly comprehensive list of the licenses they believe are
>> GPL-compatible.
>> The source that you provide needs to be th
I dig a little bit more on the Trolltech's site and i think that this
page is telling all the truth:
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/downloads/qt/faq
So, this tells us all the good stuff people in this thread are talking
about, i think is clear enough.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listi
On Apr 12, 1:02 am, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All parts of the software have to be licensed compatibly with the GPL. The FSF
> has a fairly comprehensive list of the licenses they believe are
> GPL-compatible.
> The source that you provide needs to be the preferred form for making
>
king kikapu wrote:
> Ο/Η Robert Kern έγραψε:
>> It's a bit more complicated than that. There are good resources for
>> understanding the implications of the GPL on the FSF's site which other
>> people
>> have pointed out.
>
>>From what i can understand, you can sell your product and you have to
>
Jorge Godoy wrote:
> Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I don't recommend it. You are talking to their salesman, not your lawyer. You
>> are being given a sales pitch, not legal advice.
>
> On the other hand, he's stating Trolltech's policies and agreeing /
> disagreeing on your underst
Ο/Η Robert Kern έγραψε:
> It's a bit more complicated than that. There are good resources for
> understanding the implications of the GPL on the FSF's site which other people
> have pointed out.
>From what i can understand, you can sell your product and you have to
give the source. Also you must
Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't recommend it. You are talking to their salesman, not your lawyer. You
> are being given a sales pitch, not legal advice.
On the other hand, he's stating Trolltech's policies and agreeing /
disagreeing on your understanding of their license. He's
> > Ok, i see...So i can use Qt OS edition and earn money from this as
> > long as i explicitly say (is a reference to a GPL in a readme text
> > file enough for this ?) that this software is under the GPL lisence
> > and i have the obligation to give the source code with it.
>
> It's a bit more c
king kikapu wrote:
> On Apr 11, 10:56 am, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Others have given good answers. I would only like to clarify what I think is
>> the
>> source of confusion here. While the FSF and many open source advocates make a
>> distinction between the words "commercial" (me
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 12:52, Kevin Walzer wrote:
> Yes. Nothing in the GPL prevents you from developing and marketing an
> application for as high a price as you can get from it.
>
> HOWEVER:
>
> you will have to distribute the source code to your application to
> anyone who purchases a binary
On 11 Apr, 11:51, "king kikapu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok, i see...So i can use Qt OS edition and earn money from this as
> long as i explicitly say (is a reference to a GPL in a readme text
> file enough for this ?) that this software is under the GPL lisence
> and i have the obligation to
On Apr 11, 10:56 am, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Others have given good answers. I would only like to clarify what I think is
> the
> source of confusion here. While the FSF and many open source advocates make a
> distinction between the words "commercial" (meaning that someone derive
king kikapu wrote:
> As i said, i do not fully understand all this license stuff. All i
> want to ask is, i can make GPL software and gain money from this ? And
> if that so, then why they "force" you to buy the commercial lisence in
> such case ?
Others have given good answers. I would only like
> @ Kevin and Jarek :
> thanks for the enlightening of that GPL thing. So, if i understand, i
> create my Python software using Qt as my GUI, i earn the money for it
> with the obligation to release my source code and somewhere in my
> files i explicilty write that this software is under the GPL li
king kikapu wrote:
>
>
> @ Kevin and Jarek :
> thanks for the enlightening of that GPL thing. So, if i understand, i
> create my Python software using Qt as my GUI, i earn the money for it
> with the obligation to release my source code and somewhere in my
> files i explicilty write that this so
Ο/Η Peter Decker έγραψε:
> There is another alternative: Dabo, which wraps the wxPython toolkit.
> It has a GUI designer, although not as polished as the Qt Designer.
> Check out some of their screencasts to see their tools in action. You
> can find them at http://dabodev.com/documentation
I am a
king kikapu napisał(a):
>> This is a bullsh*t. Qt is free (as in "free speech") on GPL. Nothing
>> stops you from using it in any commercial project if only it fits the
>> licensing terms (i.o.w. it's free software). This specially applies to
>> inhouse development, as in such case there's no "dis
On 10 Apr 2007 12:29:36 -0700, king kikapu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> i am coming from the Microsoft (.net) world and at the quest of
> finding the right GUI toolkit that i can use from Python, i have two
> obvious choices to choose from: wxPython and Qt.
>
> Both are looking very
king kikapu wrote:
> As i said, i do not fully understand all this license stuff. All i
> want to ask is, i can make GPL software and gain money from this ?
Yes. Nothing in the GPL prevents you from developing and marketing an
application for as high a price as you can get from it.
HOWEVER:
yo
Ο/Η Jarek Zgoda έγραψε:
> king kikapu napisa³(a):
>
> This is a bullsh*t. Qt is free (as in "free speech") on GPL. Nothing
> stops you from using it in any commercial project if only it fits the
> licensing terms (i.o.w. it's free software). This specially applies to
> inhouse development, as in s
king kikapu napisał(a):
> I saw at the forum here that a lot of debate is coming from the
> "strange" interpretation of it's Open Source Edition lisence.
> After a lot of reading i was under the impression (and many others
> with me) that even a stand alone developer working in-house at company
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
