On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Duncan Grisby wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Michi Henning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [...]
> >Instead of compiling the definition, you can write:
> >
> >Ice.loadSlice("Color.ice")
> >import M
> >
> >print "My favourite color is ", M.Color.blue
>
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Michi Henning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>Instead of compiling the definition, you can write:
>
>Ice.loadSlice("Color.ice")
>import M
>
>print "My favourite color is ", M.Color.blue
Just like this then?
omniORB.importIDL("Color.idl")
imp
> Does the Ice team claim any advantages to their Python bindings to
> CORBA over omniORBpy (The one I am currently using). [...]
> But I was wondering if there are any dynamic language
> oriented improvements in ICE bindings?
The Ice Python mapping is simpler than the CORBA one because Ice has
a
> > PS: Please feel free to set FU-Ts as appropriate.
>
> What are FU-Ts?
"It took me 3 hours to figure out FU meant 'Felix Unger'.""
-- Oscar Madison, The Odd Couple
MTC.
--
James Stroud, Ph.D.
UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics
611 Charles E. Young Dr. S.
MBI 205, UCLA
apm wrote:
Marc Laukien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
100% of the Ice source code has been developed by ZeroC employees.
Fixes, bug reports, and enhancement requests have come in from Open
Source developers around the world, as can be seen from the forums on
the
> I believe whichever road you take, ZeroC is going to find itself in
> problems. If ZeroC merges the changes made by this/these person(s),
> how can ZeroC now sell it under a commercial license, as closed source
> (violation of GPL)? If you refuse to merge the changes, you have just
> given them
Marc Laukien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> 100% of the Ice source code has been developed by ZeroC employees.
Fixes, bug reports, and enhancement requests have come in from Open
Source developers around the world, as can be seen from the forums on
the ZeroC web
Consider the *hypothetical* situation where an individual or a group
of people re-write large portions of Ice. This could enhance the
value of Ice (obviously to some, if not all), or this could conflict
with the ideologies of Ice (again, not in everyone's point of view).
How will ZeroC react to t
Marc Laukien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >
(...)
> > Am interested to know, what "percentage" (*) of the code in your CVS
> > repository has been contributed by people other than the group
> > mentioned in the quote above? Obviously, you do not allow anonymo
Interesting to see this blend of GPL and an alternative for
closed-source software.
Not totally unrelated, I saw this in your web-site (Ice vs CORBA
page):
No "Design by Committee"
Ice was designed by a small group of dedicated and highly experienced
people.
Am interested to know, what "percent
Marc Laukien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > I'm sure this is a wonderful thing, but your announcement gives absolutely
> > no clue as to what Ice is or what it is used for.
> >
> > Please include an executive summary when you make an announcement like
> > this
11 matches
Mail list logo
