Xah Lee wrote:
> A Lambda Logo Tour
> (and why LISP languages using λ as logo should not be looked upon
> kindly)
>
> Xah Lee, 2002-02
>
> Dear lispers,
For the love of Java! Where is the Java in this post?
Underwear related off topic trivia:
At university we worked out that Y-fronts weren't Y-
Xah Lee wrote:
> PS if you know any new lambda logo, please let me know. Thanks.
^
Oops, no, that would be an old lambda logo...
--
David Hopwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I bet the ∑-book also has some λ-stuff in it. If it doesn't, it
probably uses some other greek letters that aren't mentioned on the
cover. It's such a shame, really ... :(
--
Lars Rune Nøstdal
http://lars.nostdal.org/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Scripsit "Xah Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subroutines in lisps easily have side-effects, and sometimes
> non-functional programing methodologies such as OOP are actually
> encouraged in lisp. As most of you know, the lambda symbol chosen by
> functional languages is to signify no side-effects.
Wha
