Re: 2.4 VS 3.1 for simple print

2009-07-12 Thread Ben Finney
Lawrence D'Oliveiro writes: > In message <87hbxkm7n2@benfinney.id.au>, Ben Finney wrote: > > > For this and other differences introduced in the Python 3.x series, see > > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3100/>. > > People never thank you for an "RTFM" response. It's a good thing I avoid

Re: 2.4 VS 3.1 for simple print

2009-07-11 Thread Lawrence D'Oliveiro
In message <87hbxkm7n2@benfinney.id.au>, Ben Finney wrote: > For this and other differences introduced in the Python 3.x series, see > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3100/>. People never thank you for an "RTFM" response. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: 2.4 VS 3.1 for simple print

2009-07-10 Thread Ben Finney
"earthlink" writes: > Why does > > print "GarbageCollector: collected %d objects." % (gc.collect()) > > work in 2.4 but not in 3.1? For this and other differences introduced in the Python 3.x series, see http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3100/>. -- \ “Please do not feed the animals. I

Re: 2.4 VS 3.1 for simple print

2009-07-10 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> Why does > print "GarbageCollector: collected %d objects." % (gc.collect()) > > work in 2.4 but not in 3.1? Because print is a function in 3.1, so you have to follow it with a parenthesis. Regards, Martin -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: 2.4 VS 3.1 for simple print

2009-07-10 Thread Chris Rebert
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:16 PM, earthlink wrote: > Why does > print "GarbageCollector: collected %d objects." % (gc.collect()) > > work in 2.4 but not in 3.1? Define "works". What error are you getting? Include the exact message and full error traceback. Or if no exception is being raised, explai