Re: [SOLVED] There has to be a better way to split this string!

2016-02-09 Thread Chris Kaynor
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote: > > On 02/09/2016 07:47 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > > Anthony Papillion writes: > > > >> On 02/09/2016 07:26 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote: > >>> I am using datetime.now() to create a unique version of a filename. > >>> […] > >> > >> Found the so

Re: [SOLVED] There has to be a better way to split this string!

2016-02-09 Thread Anthony Papillion
On 02/09/2016 07:47 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > Anthony Papillion writes: > >> On 02/09/2016 07:26 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote: >>> I am using datetime.now() to create a unique version of a filename. >>> […] >> >> Found the solution in strftime(). Exactly what I was looking for. > > For the task of

Re: [SOLVED] There has to be a better way to split this string!

2016-02-09 Thread Ben Finney
Anthony Papillion writes: > On 02/09/2016 07:26 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote: > > I am using datetime.now() to create a unique version of a filename. > > […] > > Found the solution in strftime(). Exactly what I was looking for. For the task of making a unique filename, you should also consider th

Re: [SOLVED] There has to be a better way to split this string!

2016-02-09 Thread Anthony Papillion
On 02/09/2016 07:26 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I am using datetime.now() to create a unique version of a filename. > When the final file is named, it will look something like: > > myfile-2015-02-09-19-08-45-4223 > > Notice I'm replacing all of the "."'s, " "'s, and ":"'s