On 2021-10-28 19:48:06 -0400, Avi Gross via Python-list wrote:
> My right ALT key now lets me type in all kinds of nonsense like ⑦ and
> © and ß and ℵ0 and ⅔ and ≠ and ⇒ and ♬and although :- makes ÷ I see
> := makes ≔ which is just a longer equals sign.
Ah, yes. That's another problem with using
On 2021-10-28, Avi Gross via Python-list wrote:
> I see := makes ≔ which is just a longer equals sign.
On my screen it's an assignment operator that looks like := only a bit
smaller.
> Not sure this mailing list allows this stuff, so if your mailer does
> not show it, never mind.
Everything re
, that should do even on standard keyboards.
∴
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Chris Angelico
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2021 3:24 PM
To: Python
Subject: Re: walrus with a twist :+= or ...
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 5:53 AM Avi Gross via Python-list
wrote:
> Is ther
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 5:53 AM Avi Gross via Python-list
wrote:
> Is there a reasonable extension to a keyboard that might be reasonable,
> perhaps with an accommodation to those without such a keyboard so that
> entering some sequence gets it converted into what you want on the screen
> but more
ything like I am describing (or something much better)
is being looked at?
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Peter J. Holzer
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2021 5:08 AM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: walrus with a twist :+= or ...
On 2021-10-27 22:15:09 -0400, Avi
On 2021-10-27 22:15:09 -0400, Avi Gross via Python-list wrote:
> But a serious question is now that we sort of have UNICODE, and even many
> editors and other programs support it, perhaps it might make sense for some
> operations in computer languages to make use of them.
I have thought so since t
The proposal is very interesting, my only concern is readability
unless a team has a tool check and flag it out as a process.
Else i fear one day i'll be seeing =+_+= in Python code.
But jokes aside @Avi why would someone want to immediately add a 2
after walrus defining it? in :+=2
Kind Regards
we got along fine before a walrus came along, ...
or did we?
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of MRAB
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 9:21 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: walrus with a twist :+= or ...
On 2021-10-28 02:06, Avi Gross via Python-list wrote:
>
Wednesday, October 27, 2021 9:11 PM
To: Python
Subject: Re: walrus with a twist :+= or ...
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:58 AM Avi Gross via Python-list
wrote:
> On a serious note, if it was ever considered a good idea, what would
> be an acceptable sequence of symbols that might not b
On 2021-10-28 02:06, Avi Gross via Python-list wrote:
I just realized I left out **= so my apologies. Are there other such
abbreviations and does anyone use them?
You forgot about the bitwise operators: |= &= ^=
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Avi Gross via Python
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:58 AM Avi Gross via Python-list
wrote:
> On a serious note, if it was ever considered a good idea, what would be an
> acceptable sequence of symbols that might not break or confuse existing
> programs and what would we call it? I mean what animal, of course.
>
>
>
> What
I just realized I left out **= so my apologies. Are there other such
abbreviations and does anyone use them?
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Avi Gross via Python-list
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 8:57 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: walrus with a twist :+= or
12 matches
Mail list logo
