I'm not sure but it seems like you could use operator.__contains__ . it
might be faster.
On 28 Jul 2013 20:18, "Peter Otten" <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>
> >> Has anyone encountered this and utilized other existing functions
> >> within the shipped 3.6.21 sqlite version to
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Has anyone encountered this and utilized other existing functions
>> within the shipped 3.6.21 sqlite version to accomplish this?
>
> Sorry guys, forgot about create_function...
Too late, I already did the demo ;)
>>> import sqlite3
>>> db = sqlite3.connect(":memory:"
> Has anyone encountered this and utilized other existing functions
> within the shipped 3.6.21 sqlite version to accomplish this?
Sorry guys, forgot about create_function...
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
