Michele Simionato wrote:
Also, one could argue that the designer should
not get in touch with the HTML, but just play with the CSS.
Finally, you can achieve separation between logic and presentation just
putting the routines generating the HTML pages in a separate module, no need to
use
a differe
Matt Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Agreed. Although I would go further and say that it's important to
> choose a templating system that allows the Python developer to annotate
> XHTML templates using **valid XML**, i.e. no "for x in y" loops, no "if
> foo" conditionals, no "i = 0" var
Kent Johnson wrote:
> Michele Simionato wrote:
> > The problem is a problem of standardization, indeed. There plenty
of
> > recipes to
> > do the same job, I just would like to use a blessed one (I am
teaching
> > a Python
> > course and I do not know what to recommend to my students).
>
> Why not
Michele Simionato wrote:
> The problem is a problem of standardization, indeed.
> There are plenty of recipes to do the same job, I just
> would like to use a blessed one (I am teaching a Python
> course and I do not know what to recommend to my students).
Wouldn't we *all* like all of our problem
Kent Johnson:
>I've written web pages this way (using a pretty nice Java HTML
generation package) >and I don't
>recommend it. In my experience, this approach has several drawbacks:
>- as soon as the web page gets at all complex, the conceptual shift
from HTML to >code and back is
>difficult.
>- It
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 07:36 -0500, Kent Johnson wrote:
> Michele Simionato wrote:
> > The problem is a problem of standardization, indeed. There plenty of
> > recipes to
> > do the same job, I just would like to use a blessed one (I am teaching
> > a Python
> > course and I do not know what to reco
Michele Simionato wrote:
The problem is a problem of standardization, indeed. There plenty of
recipes to
do the same job, I just would like to use a blessed one (I am teaching
a Python
course and I do not know what to recommend to my students).
Why not teach your students to use a template system?
The problem is a problem of standardization, indeed. There plenty of
recipes to
do the same job, I just would like to use a blessed one (I am teaching
a Python
course and I do not know what to recommend to my students).
FWIW, here is a my version of the recipe (stripped down to the bare
essentials
xtian wrote:
> Stan (part of nevow, which is part of twisted) is a nice python
syntax
> for building HTML
[...]
> I don't know how detachable it is from the rest of nevow. I'd assume
it
> wouldn't be too difficult to implement in a standalone fashion.
FWIW I whipped up a simple self-contained Stan
Stan (part of nevow, which is part of twisted) is a nice python syntax
for building HTML - I like the use of () and [] to separate attributes
from sub-elements.
For example:
class Greeter(rend.Page):
def greet(self, context, data):
return random.choice(["Hello", "Greetings", "Hi"]), "
Here are a couple of pointers. I agree with Michele that it would be
nice to have some kind of standardization. Maybe this would be worth a
post to the Web-SIG ?
- I posted a 70-line recipe on the Python Cookbook, a sort of poor man's
HTMLGen called HTMLTags
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Coo
Michele Simionato wrote:
> What is the recommended way of generating HTML from Python? I know of
> HTMLGen and of
> few recipes in the Cookbook, but is there something which is more or
> less standard?
I'm also an htmlgen user, but it's getting a bit long in the tooth, and the
installation is not
Just to clarify, before people start pointing out their preferred
templating language: I am NOT asking for
a template system. I am asking for something on the
lines of HTMLGen, where you just use pure Python.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Michele Simionato napisał(a):
What is the recommended way of generating HTML from Python? I know of
HTMLGen and of
few recipes in the Cookbook, but is there something which is more or
less standard?
Also, are there plans to include a module for HTML generation in the
standard library?
I really woul
14 matches
Mail list logo
