RE: reactiveX vs Async

2017-01-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
> So you are saying that nuget-ing .Net core would be a workable pre-requisite > for > Rx on mono? Microsoft open sourced .net a while ago. With that came the movement to bring .net to other platforms. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Framework#.NET_Core As its currently being heavily develop

Re: reactiveX vs Async

2017-01-11 Thread Rustom Mody
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 7:47:21 AM UTC+5:30, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > > One more question: Do you know if (and how much) of these things would work > > in Linux/C# (ie mono)? > > Mono, I forgot what that is when .net core debuted:) A brief elaboration on that please?? ∵ … > > Looks lik

RE: reactiveX vs Async

2017-01-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
> One more question: Do you know if (and how much) of these things would work > in Linux/C# (ie mono)? Mono, I forgot what that is when .net core debuted:) Looks like the .net Rx guys have a port, https://github.com/Reactive-Extensions/Rx.NET/issues/148 A package for .net core is up on nuget.

RE: reactiveX vs Async

2017-01-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
> Thanks Joseph > Trouble is there is stew of technologies/languages… > (meta)-stewed with more abstract concepts, eg push vs pull, > Enumerable-Observable > duality, continuous vs discrete time > The last causing its own share of confusion with “functional reactive > programming” (FRP) meaning s

Re: reactiveX vs Async

2017-01-11 Thread Rustom Mody
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 6:50:09 AM UTC+5:30, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > However, I have only used the .NET implementations. One more question: Do you know if (and how much) of these things would work in Linux/C# (ie mono)? -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: reactiveX vs Async

2017-01-11 Thread Rustom Mody
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 6:50:09 AM UTC+5:30, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >> There is the recent flurry around the new async additions to python > > > > I meant to add: “… which I dont pretend to understand…” > > Try these links on for size: > > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh24

RE: reactiveX vs Async

2017-01-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>> There is the recent flurry around the new async additions to python > > I meant to add: “… which I dont pretend to understand…” Try these links on for size: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh242982(v=vs.103).aspx which links to https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh242983(v=vs.10

RE: reactiveX vs Async

2017-01-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
> Try these links on for size: > > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh242982(v=vs.103).aspx which links > to > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh242983(v=vs.103).aspx near the end. These two SO threads have a variation of pretty good explanations: http://stackoverflow.com/questi

Re: reactiveX vs Async

2017-01-11 Thread Rustom Mody
On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 at 10:21:02 PM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote: > There is the recent flurry around the new async additions to python I meant to add: “… which I dont pretend to understand…” -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list