James Stroud wrote:
Andreas Waldenburger wrote:
Is it me, or has c.l.p. developed a slightly harsher tone recently?
(Haven't been following for a while.)
Yep. I can only post here for about a week or two until someone blows a
cylinder and gets ugly because they interpreted something I said as
On Dec 6, 2:22 pm, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> I see your wink, but, please, did you read that thread started by "r"
> about the Ruby API for some piece of Google software? That was so
> offensively fanboyish that I almost removed Python from my computer.
The on
alex23 wrote:
On Dec 6, 8:00 am, James Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think its a symptom of the language's
maturing, getting popular, and a minority fraction* of the language's
most devout advocates developing an egotism that complements their
python worship in a most unsavory way.
It's
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:00:12 -0800, alex23 wrote:
> On Dec 6, 8:00 am, James Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think its a symptom of the language's maturing, getting popular, and
>> a minority fraction* of the language's most devout advocates developing
>> an egotism that complements their p
On Dec 6, 8:00 am, James Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think its a symptom of the language's
> maturing, getting popular, and a minority fraction* of the language's
> most devout advocates developing an egotism that complements their
> python worship in a most unsavory way.
It's hard to se
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:00:18 -0800, James Stroud wrote:
> Andreas Waldenburger wrote:
>> Is it me, or has c.l.p. developed a slightly harsher tone recently?
>> (Haven't been following for a while.)
>
> Yep. I can only post here for about a week or two until someone blows a
> cylinder and gets ugl
On Dec 5, 4:00 pm, James Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andreas Waldenburger wrote:
> > Is it me, or has c.l.p. developed a slightly harsher tone recently?
> > (Haven't been following for a while.)
>
> Yep. I can only post here for about a week or two until someone blows a
> cylinder and gets
Andreas Waldenburger wrote:
Is it me, or has c.l.p. developed a slightly harsher tone recently?
(Haven't been following for a while.)
Yep. I can only post here for about a week or two until someone blows a
cylinder and gets ugly because they interpreted something I said as a
criticism of the
Warren, weren't you aware that Python.org is now a church. So you can never
live up to the standards of the Pythonista high priests. You can only ask a
question or submit your comment then cower, hoping the pythonista high
priests don't beat you with clubs for heresy.
;)
2008/12/4 Warren DeLa
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 16:17:20 -0800 "Warren DeLano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Thank so much for the suggestions Ben. Sorry that I am personally
> unable to live up to your high standards, but it is nevertheless an
> honor to partipicate in such a helpful and mutually respectful
> community maili
> From: Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> "Chris Mellon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Peculiarities in usenet resulted in this discussion having several
> > threads and I missed some messages before I wrote this email.
>
> I'll put this more bluntly: Warren's messages to date
> egregious
"Chris Mellon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peculiarities in usenet resulted in this discussion having several
> threads and I missed some messages before I wrote this email.
I'll put this more bluntly: Warren's messages to date egregiously
break the flow of discussion.
Warren, in the interest
Chris Mellon wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Warren DeLano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yet Another Python Troll (the ivory tower reference, as well as the
abrupt shift from complaining about keywords to multiprocessing), I
have to point out that Python does add new keywords, it has done so
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Warren DeLano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I still would have to call your management of the problem considerably
>> into question - your expertise at writing mathematical software may
>> not be in question, but your skills and producing and managing a
>> software p
> I still would have to call your management of the problem considerably
> into question - your expertise at writing mathematical software may
> not be in question, but your skills and producing and managing a
> software product are. You have nobody at your organization, which
> sells a product tha
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Warren DeLano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yet Another Python Troll (the ivory tower reference, as well as the
>> abrupt shift from complaining about keywords to multiprocessing), I
>> have to point out that Python does add new keywords, it has done so in
>> the pas
16 matches
Mail list logo
