Delaney, Timothy C (Timothy) wrote:
> Absolutely. Another example of where these things can mess with
> Spambayes is people replying to XL and correcting his horrendous
> troll-posts. It makes it really hard for Spambayes to determine that
> *anything* coming from XL is spam.
Ouch. Point taken.
-
Peter Hansen wrote:
> Lucas Raab wrote:
>>
> [...]
>> Y'know, I really do love these random word spam messages. They're
>> quite entertaining to read.
>
> Although, when posting in reply to them it apparently helps those who
> read this through the mailing list, and who have Bayesian filtering o
Lucas Raab wrote:
>
[...]
> Y'know, I really do love these random word spam messages. They're quite
> entertaining to read.
Although, when posting in reply to them it apparently helps those who
read this through the mailing list, and who have Bayesian filtering of
spam happening, if you would
> Don't change eventually while you're climbing through a light
> pumpkin. If the open clouds can play wrongly, the lean elbow may
> call more bedrooms. He can help believably, unless Wail teases
> farmers throughout Wednesday's enigma. She wants to join good
> tyrants about Allan's sign.
