Re: Question on compiling on linux

2016-06-28 Thread alister
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 21:39:42 -0600, Michael Torrie wrote: > On 06/27/2016 08:28 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:01 am, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: >> >>> The Outlook style works well in a business environment where the >>> recipient is likely the original sender of the quoted te

Re: Question on compiling on linux

2016-06-27 Thread Michael Torrie
On 06/27/2016 08:28 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:01 am, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: > >> The Outlook style works well in a business environment where the >> recipient is likely the original sender of the quoted text, and doesn't >> need the context -- the quoted copy is just a

Re: Question on compiling on linux

2016-06-27 Thread Steven D'Aprano
Oh, and while I'm ranting about top-posting, there's another reason why it's shit. Speaking from experience, it makes searching email archives awful. I've been in the position of having to go through email archives looking for relevant email discussions related to a legal dispute. Trying to search

Re: Question on compiling on linux

2016-06-27 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:01 am, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: > The Outlook style works well in a business environment where the > recipient is likely the original sender of the quoted text, and doesn't > need the context -- the quoted copy is just a courtesy copy in this case. No it doesn't work well.

Re: Question on compiling on linux

2016-06-27 Thread Random832
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016, at 00:26, Zachary Ware wrote: > A: Because you have to read things in reverse order. > Q: Why? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What's one of the most annoying common email practices? Which is witty, but doesn't *actually* explain why it's bad. 1. The intent, as I understand it, with

Re: Question on compiling on linux

2016-06-26 Thread Zachary Ware
On Saturday, June 25, 2016, Steven Truppe wrote: > > i hope this email works like you expected! Not quite, but closer. You've quoted me properly, but you added your reply above the quote, so-called "top-posting". A: Because you have to read things in reverse order. Q: Why? A: Top-posting. Q: Wh

Re: Question on compiling on linux

2016-06-25 Thread Steven Truppe
i hope this email works like you expected! I found the libpython3.so, i don't know why i was not able to see it, thank you very much to everyone wo helped me! No my last question(s) is how can i create debug/release builds ? Am 2016-06-24 um 22:08 schrieb Zachary Ware: On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 a

RE: Question on compiling on linux

2016-06-24 Thread Joaquin Alzola
>That gives me many .so files but no python*.so* file :( Install the python-devel. This email is confidential and may be subject to privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not copy or disclose its content but contact the sender immediately upon receipt. -- https://mail.pytho

Re: Question on compiling on linux

2016-06-24 Thread Zachary Ware
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Steven Truppe wrote: > That gives me many .so files but no python*.so* file :( Where are you finding these many .so files? There should be libpython3.5m.so in the root of the source tree (alongside `python`). By the way, I'm not sure how you're accessing the lis

Re: Question on compiling on linux

2016-06-24 Thread Steven Truppe
That gives me many .so files but no python*.so* file :( Am 2016-06-24 um 20:35 schrieb Steven Truppe: So back to my first question now that you saw everything worked fine, but there is no python.so file, did i miss something when using ./configure ? Am 2016-06-24 um 20:23 schrieb Chris Angel

Re: Question on compiling on linux

2016-06-24 Thread Zachary Ware
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Steven Truppe wrote: > So back to my first question now that you saw everything worked fine, but > there is no python.so file, did i miss something when using ./configure ? Try `./configure --enable-shared`. -- Zach -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/p

Re: Question on compiling on linux

2016-06-24 Thread Steven Truppe
So back to my first question now that you saw everything worked fine, but there is no python.so file, did i miss something when using ./configure ? Am 2016-06-24 um 20:23 schrieb Chris Angelico: On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 4:19 AM, Steven Truppe wrote: But that's not a library file, it's the in

Re: Question on compiling on linux

2016-06-24 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 4:19 AM, Steven Truppe wrote: > But that's not a library file, it's the interpreter, i need the library to > extend and embend python into my own application ... Bouncing back to the list (please keep it there). The reason I mentioned ./python is that, if it isn't there,

Re: Question on compiling on linux

2016-06-24 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Steven Truppe wrote: > i want to write an application that does extend and embed Python. I > downloaded the sources for 3.5.1 and used ./confiugure to build. > > In the old times i got a file called python.so somewhere but now i get many > .so files and how can